Sophie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,033
- Reaction score
- 106
The deposits with matching DNA are on each side of the waistband of the longjohns, and mixed with blood in her underwear. Thats probably why ML characterized it as highly unlikely the DNA was deposited in these places innocently. There are several news reports to this effect, and the new DA's office hasn't really discounted the DNA findings.
Its really a show-stopper for RDI because the foreign male DNA can't be attributed to a factory worker like it was before, because it was found on more than one article of clothing JBR was wearing at the time she was murdered, AND it was found in criminally conspicuous places.
HOTYH, I am not very knowledgeable about DNA so I am prefacing this remark with an apologia to the effect that I may be displaying my ignorance. However, pretty recently one of the blokes who invented the barcoding system for DNA (whose name I forget but will remember in due course) was on telly here talking about an entirely unrelated crime. He had grave misgivings about how well law enforcement understood DNA and said that anyone depending on unknown DNA while ignoring other investigative findings was not helping the judicial process.