MHamby
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 0
In most cases, there are a number of 'loop-holes' in an investigation. You have to admit that RC is the most likely candidate for doing this.
My question is, why the mutilation off the bat? If I was looking for a place to hide a body, one which I had just strangled, I wouldn't mutilate it right there. Once finding the 'hiding place' and realizing that I couldn't squeeze the body in intact, that is when I would have to cut it up.
However, that would not leave blood everywhere.
Based on this evidence, I believe the RC is the murderer, but I also don't think that he acted alone. I believe someone helped him.
I am assuming that once you swipe into a room, someone could walk right behind you into it, and therefore not show up as being 'in the room'. Perhaps that is the reason for the multiple swipes, as someone went to one room to clean it, and the other(s) used the card and prepared the room to house the body.
This could also be a reason for the 'sock' to be left there. It was someone elses responsibility to get rid of the evidence.
Just throwing things out there. I'm sure someone will find sufficient evidence to refute all that I have just said :crazy:
My question is, why the mutilation off the bat? If I was looking for a place to hide a body, one which I had just strangled, I wouldn't mutilate it right there. Once finding the 'hiding place' and realizing that I couldn't squeeze the body in intact, that is when I would have to cut it up.
However, that would not leave blood everywhere.
Based on this evidence, I believe the RC is the murderer, but I also don't think that he acted alone. I believe someone helped him.
I am assuming that once you swipe into a room, someone could walk right behind you into it, and therefore not show up as being 'in the room'. Perhaps that is the reason for the multiple swipes, as someone went to one room to clean it, and the other(s) used the card and prepared the room to house the body.
This could also be a reason for the 'sock' to be left there. It was someone elses responsibility to get rid of the evidence.
Just throwing things out there. I'm sure someone will find sufficient evidence to refute all that I have just said :crazy: