ARRESTED- Luka Rocco Magnotta:1st deg murder charge;INTERPOL alert #6

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
for what its worth said:
I'd like to add, what about the rights of the person who met their end in the most horrific way imaginable? For those arguing about their rights to view 'reality', are your rights greater than the rights of this person?

I'm not in favour of censorship but in the case of murder or the like, I am. It's a respect issue and one which I think most of us would want when we meet our end. I for one, would never want photos of my death to be made available for anyone to see and given that it's my life. It fills me with dread, actually and I really feel it's a violation of the victim's rights.

[EDIT: I also did not watch the video for this reason as well as not thinking that I could handle viewing it]
Click to expand...

This is how I feel
I couldn't find the words to express it

Thank You
 
Girlwiththestartat said:
In regards to this as well, not sure if it sensationalizing but they do mention in the same article he was caught looking at 'pornographic pictures of himself'.

Maybe this means it was due to him being narcissistic, and not an overly sexual need?

Again, could just be news outlets 'jumbling' various reports.
Click to expand...

He may have wanted to post a new `sexy` video of himself to his "fans" by editing those *advertiser censored* photos of himself. JMO
 
The problem I mostly have with the dissemination of the video is that so many people make rude and disrespectful comments in response to it. If everyone were like websleuths members who have studied the video to possibly help LE and understand that kind of sick mind, I wouldn't mind it so much.
 
Hey guyz ... catching up and still in thread #5 but wanted to point this out:

The addy for JL re the sublet of the apartment is different from the one in the whois search for the homobjs website ... both on St. Mathieu, but different street numbers (2121 vs 1160)
 
PAXIMUS said:
You answered for me, people study crime, period. We need to study it and get in to the heads of killers in order to prevent it and catch them.
Click to expand...

I hope I didn't step on your toes, but it bothers me deeply when someone says, "there is no use in this for me, so there should be no use in it for anyone else."

The world is scary. The things that happen in it are scary. The people that allow themselves to see that and learn to function with that knowledge are the ones that are better prepared for evil when they do come face to face with it. It is my personal belief, nothing more, and no more valid than anyone else's beliefs to the contrary, but I'm still going to defend it.

I hope I didn't seem to be trying to fight your battles or speak for you, you are perfectly capable of doing all that on your own.
 
Girlwiththestartat said:
In regards to this as well, not sure if it sensationalizing but they do mention in the same article he was caught looking at 'pornographic pictures of himself'.

Maybe this means it was due to him being narcissistic, and not an overly sexual need?

Again, could just be news outlets 'jumbling' various reports.
Click to expand...

Its always possible he was just looking at one of the many sites that also include shots from his *advertiser censored* movie (BTW I have only been able to find 1 *advertiser censored* movie he did..others are labeled as him, but if you look at the face it's not him...I heard he was trying to "bury" any real ones out there?)and he wasn't looking at naked pics of himself, so much as he was checking out the ED site (who happens to have some shots of the only real LM *advertiser censored* I've seen)..

This also brings up my question as to why the headlines even bother to call him a *advertiser censored* actor...if he only did one or two...

Just some thoughts...need to go back and read...was away :)
 
prima.facie said:
im not speaking for PAX as he is capable himself :floorlaugh:

but for me....when i first viewed it, it was BEFORE this story hit WS and the news. I was following something else and it led me there. i didnt think it was real. when it hit the news and it was being discussed here - many many many people did not believe it was real. they also did not believe LM had anything to do with it.

as a criminal investigation major i have GREAT inerest in these things....i study these things. so i went back and watched the video to look at the blood, the post mordem death stuff.................and to analyze the vid against known pics of LM to prove it was all actually him.

there are many people like me on this forum and thruout who study this stuff and it is a learning experience.

do you know how many people have admitted here and other places they didnt even realize this sh.t was going on across the world? they had no idea this kind of evil was existing......NOW they know. now they realize life isnt about rainbows....

while i find it disgustingly horrible what happened, i also can learn from it. may not make sense to many, but when i look at dead bodies (from various means) all the time, this is one more example, i learn.....

i most certainly didnt just sit there watching it because there wasnt something else on TV....

in regards to your comment on bestgore's owner.....i am absolutely sure he would beg to defer with you....he has made comment after comment of his intention for his site....people dont have to visit it. and people wont.

with that said....what are your thoughts on the mass amount of books out there for educational purposes in which anyone can buy that show MUCH MUCH more gory stuff?
Click to expand...

As a criminal investigation major I agree you may have a legitimate reason for viewing the tape. I'm a Nurse and contributing to the degradation of a victim isn't in my job description. I've had the written report and know enough about physiology and anatomy to not need a slideshow or video on what damage an icepick can do or what masturbation with a severed limb might look like. Being creative, I can use my imagination.
In a market economy, if there was no market there would be no need for the product. Obviously there's a huge market of criminal investigators satisfying a demand for educational material depicting snuff. As long as there's a market I guess we can expect a constant need for new even more creative gorier gore.

Regarding the Best Gore site. I've heard and read his justifications and I'm calling BS on him. If he's providing an educational service then people should be required to register and verify their age before accessing his educational material. But no, that would cut down on the number of hits he gets and the revenue his 'public service' provides.

MO
 
Sigh Sister said:
Found some more LM postings:


http://upload.democraticunderground...mesg&forum=221&topic_id=136758&mesg_id=136758


http://www.democraticunderground.co...sg&forum=105&topic_id=8838204&mesg_id=8838204

Apparently, he was quickly banned. Ha.

Sorry if these have already been posted
Click to expand...
Great find! Had not seen those before.

It is really insane at how much this guy put himself all over the place online. I've found Youtube channels where literally his various personas are all agreeing with each other about Luka. It is like schizophrenia captured in text.
 
PAXIMUS said:
I have an appt to tend to but for the record I did not watch the video right away it took a lot for me to get to that point, having served in a war theater and seen that type of violence first hand I dont need to revisit it in my free time and bring back those haunting memories. But since I do work in criminal law I founid I was unable to have a real conversation about this case without knowing what was on that video so I watched it ONE TIME and that is it, I do sort of regret it but at least now I can have an informed discussion about this case and I also understand that our world isnt the place many think it is, those rose colored glasses are nice but they dont tell us the truth.
Click to expand...

You don't need to watch this video to have an informed discussion or understand that the world is ugly. To each their own of course...


Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
 
prima.facie said:
the problem is...the deep web and torrents. that video can never be removed....the deep web is alive and active and this video and similar will be sent all around the world. then there are the people who have downloaded..

once something has been posted online, the chance of it ever going away is nearly impossible w/out 100% censorship and an army of people working to remove what they want removed....it would be never ending....

that is why its always a good rule of thumb that if you dont want what you post ever coming back to haunt you, keep your thoughts to yourself....
Click to expand...

I watched it once not fully knowing what was on it. Yes, I knew the basis, but not enough to prepare myself. I ended up skimming it in one minute intervals, and then threw up, poured myself a good shot of Jack, threw up again, got smart enough to put the Jack in some Coke, and determined that I was never going online again.

Then I watched it a second time because there was some controversy about the type of animal in the vid and because I felt that those that didn't watch it still needed to know what they were getting involved in when they got involved with the case. I detached as much as possible (meaning I got just buzzed enough to pretend it wasn't real), and watched it a second time, transcribing carefully what I saw. This way others could know exactly what was on it, and any future questions that I might have about it would already be answered. (Luka wasn't caught yet.)

I never downloaded it, and frankly, that is the only part that bothers me about the vid being out there, is teh ability to download it for whatever reason.

It'll never be gone. There are other vids out there that are worse, and just like Jun's final moments and dismemberment, those vidoes will never be removed either. Videos like this that are posted on the surface web might be used for something besides entertainment. Those that are posted deep web and downloaded into private collections are almost always used for further immoral purposes.
 
kaRN said:
respectfully snipped by me-

Following your logic it would be remiss of the principal of those schools in Vancouver not to show the elementary students the snuff film linked to the package they received. Where do you draw the line. Children should have the same creative rights as the rest of us. If it's an educational tool for the masses what better place to start the creative education than in a school right.
Click to expand...

RSBM:

No offense intended but your last paragraph went a bit too far off the deep end. They never said it was educational, the website owner did and that website is intended for adults not elementary school children.

Adults have the right to watch/read/listen to what they want a child should never be subjected to anything like this.

JMO
 
nursebeeme said:
does anyone remember that case where the girl was killed in a car crash and there was video of it and her parents tried to get it (without success) removed from the internet? In fact the attention that it drew (reports of them trying to get it removed) actually increased the number of people trying to find it to watch it...

I could see that happening here.. (re: making a huge deal about it=more people trying to find it to watch, etc etc etc)


I hope that made sense
Click to expand...

I will never forget the horror of that. Nikki Catsouras was the girl.
Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
The suggestion that those of us who feel that these types of videos should not be on the internet are wearing rose colored glasses is condescending. I'm fully aware of the evils that exist in this world, and I know this without ever having watched the video or any like it.
 
Girlwiththestartat said:
This is mentioned in this article, not sure if it has been brought up here. I think we have made the connection to the American Psycho music.. but not sure if 1987 is relevant. As they mention he was born in '92 - so would have been 5. Maybe thats when things went really bad for him?

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/...d-videos-while-on-the-run-montreal-police-say
Click to expand...

Was just going to post that! lol...maybe something bad happened to him that year...he would have been 5...or maybe no meaning other than the songs themselves..
 
Girlwiththestartat said:
This is mentioned in this article, not sure if it has been brought up here. I think we have made the connection to the American Psycho music.. but not sure if 1987 is relevant. As they mention he was born in '92 - so would have been 5. Maybe thats when things went really bad for him?

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/...d-videos-while-on-the-run-montreal-police-say
Click to expand...

I remember reading (somewhere) that he went to live with his grandmother when he was five?
 
Jujercu said:
Its always possible he was just looking at one of the many sites that also include shots from his *advertiser censored* movie (BTW I have only been able to find 1 *advertiser censored* movie he did..others are labeled as him, but if you look at the face it's not him...I heard he was trying to "bury" any real ones out there?)and he wasn't looking at naked pics of himself, so much as he was checking out the ED site (who happens to have some shots of the only real LM *advertiser censored* I've seen)..

This also brings up my question as to why the headlines even bother to call him a *advertiser censored* actor...if he only did one or two...

Just some thoughts...need to go back and read...was away :)
Click to expand...

Interesting post.

Many sites are still talking about him as a *advertiser censored* actor, and some (in the UK at least) are referring to him as a *advertiser censored* star, which he certainly never was.

He made a couple of low-grade *advertiser censored* flicks for the web, that's it. Thousands of people have done that. He also posted a clip purporting to be him which isn't.

**maybe too much info for some**

I saw a preview clip of one of his rare *advertiser censored* clips from a few years back. He was cute, but seemed very detached. He seemed so bored I wondered how he had an e******n. It reminded me of the escort review he had which said that trying to make love with him was like trying to do it with a wet fish.
 
 
Sigh Sister said:
The suggestion that those of us who feel that these types of videos should not be on the internet are wearing rose colored glasses is condescending. I'm fully aware of the evils that exist in this world, and I know this without ever having watched the video or any like it.
Click to expand...

i dont think the meaning was "those who dont want to watch it" nor was it meant to offend anyone here...

i read numerous comments here and other places where people admitted they were naive to the evils that happen in this world....

i have a friend whom i was sort of discussing this case with and she was SHOCKED that things like this happened in the world.

so in reality, there are a load of people who truly do not realize what evil lurks out there.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 207 more.
Total: 453 (members: 208, guests: 245)

Online statistics

Members online
208
Guests online
245
Total visitors
453
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,859
Messages
18,246,491
Members
234,470
Latest member
Nunya56
Back
Top