Devon
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 767
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't disagree with the point of your post. Any way you analyze the situation the prosecutors and L.E. achieved the conviction of an innocent man.
However, I also agree completely with the last part of your referenced quote: "What happened before does not mitigate the fact that they chose to let an innocent man take the rap for a murderer and sentenced him to a living death. The responsibility lies at their feet."
Right or wrong on my part, I hold a higher standard of responsibility for the attorneys because they KNEW Logan was innocent. The prosecutors and L.E. apparently BELIEVED Logan was guilty, unless there are nefarious motives on their part of which I am not aware.
IMO, the attorneys only 'knew' Logan was innocent to the extent of the evidence provided by the statements of Wilson and Hope. By the same measure, and also IMO, the investigating officers/prosecution also 'knew' that Logan was innocent of murder because they had discovered that the gun used was owned by, and found in the possession of, another person entirely - a man they eventually charged with 2 other murders. I wonder if the bullets found in the 2 murdered police officers matched the ones found in the McDonalds victims? Did anyone bother to check?