Australia - 3 dead after eating wild mushrooms, Leongatha, Victoria, Aug 2023 #5 *Arrest*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Soon after Erin Patterson put out her “statement” it was reported that journalists went door-to-door in the town where Erin said she purchased dried mushrooms from, the “Asian” stores in that particular locality.

The reporters spoke to the staff and owners, and they asked the tough questions. And surprise - none of them sell death cap mushrooms, and they were all reportedly horrified. Horrified.
Nowhere sells death caps though because they are toxic. So why would the reporters go door to door asking if they sell death caps. The media has turned this into a circus imo.
 
Last edited:
Today marks two months since the lunch.
If it was an unintentional foraging mistake, surely EP would have come clean by now to avoid drawing out all hers and her family’s suffering.
I don’t think many would put so much on the line just to save face.
 
Totally possible,

@jjleroche

But it still doesn’t explains how or why she was the only adult at the lunch who didn’t get “mushroom poisoning”.

If someone set her up, or maybe switched out her Asian dried mushrooms with Death Caps in her pantry, she still would have been poisoned if they all ate the same lunch.

IMO
I'm not sure we can be positive she didn't have mushroom poisoning?

She presented to Leongatha Hospital (confirmed by Health Services) on the Sunday July 30th, went home and then returned the following day whereby she was transferred by ambulance to Monash Hospital on Monday 31st July.

"Ms Patterson said it had not been previously reported that she was also hospitalised after the lunch with bad stomach pains and diarrhoea, and was put on a saline drip and given a "liver protective drug".


She may have had a milder case of poisoning or a stronger resilience to it.

There are studies found on google giving data on mortality rates which state the elderly are more severely affected. Also one study said elderly and also women are more affected. Perhaps due to men generally having a bigger build?

From the linked study of mushroom poisoning patients in the ACT - there have been 7 mushroom poisoning patients all under the age of 47. 1 patient died (aged 46) and 6 recovered.

 
Last edited:
Today marks two months since the lunch.
If it was an unintentional foraging mistake, surely EP would have come clean by now to avoid drawing out all hers and her family’s suffering.
I don’t think many would put so much on the line just to save face.

I guess it depends what EP thinks is on the line.

She almost certainly would not be incarcerated for an accidental DC poisoning. I have not seen one example yet of charges for an accidental poisoning (in all of our Aussie DC poisoning research.)

Would she think her children or others would look down on her if she accidently added foraged poisonous mushrooms to her dish?

I can't think what she might be saving face about.

That there is now a huge investigation and she is embarrassed that she lied about the source of mushrooms?
 
I guess it depends what EP thinks is on the line.

She almost certainly would not be incarcerated for an accidental DC poisoning. I have not seen one example yet of charges for an accidental poisoning (in all of our Aussie DC poisoning research.)

Would she think her children or others would look down on her if she accidently added foraged poisonous mushrooms to her dish?

I can't think what she might be saving face about.

That there is now a huge investigation and she is embarrassed that she lied about the source of mushrooms?
Well if it was unintentional she is already experiencing so many probably avoidable consequences by not coming clean.
The awful scrutiny and accusations from the public and the media, feeling that her movements are limited by the throng of media wherever she goes, anxiety provoking questions from investigators, her phone/technology being confiscated and analyzed, possibly being separated from her children (we don’t know for certain) and possible animosity and suspicion from SP and family are just a few things.

I just can’t understand why someone would endure all that, and face possible criminal charges rather than just admit they’d made a mistake.
 
Although it happened when she was 29, it still gives some idea of how she sometimes deals with stress/pressure. She fled from the scene after crashing her vehicle, and when caught, refused to give them her name, etc
Imo she didn’t want to get in trouble.

Even at 29, she knew she’d done the wrong thing, presumably. Her mum wouldn’t have been happy.

Just saying: It’s a really, really long time between (alleged) offenses. If she has in fact committed a [recent] crime.

All jmo
 
Imo she didn’t want to get in trouble.
Of course, no one wants to get in trouble. But she made some very very bad decisions that night. She was twice the legal alcohol limit while driving.
Even at 29, she knew she’d done the wrong thing, presumably. Her mum wouldn’t have been happy.
She was TWENTY NINE. She wasn't 17, so who cares if her mom would be happy or not? At 29, one should be mature enough to deal with tough consequences. If you crash your car, driving away at 95 miles per hour to flee the scene is not the best course of action.
Just saying: It’s a really, really long time between (alleged) offenses. If she has in fact committed a [recent] crime.

All jmo
It doesn't matter how long ago she was 'charged' with anything---the real question is how long ago since she actually committed an offence? She has been accused by her ex of poisoning him recently.

I don't know if she did or not, but it wouldn't be all that surprising if it was true. It does look like a possible pattern, IMO.
 
I'm not sure we can be positive she didn't have mushroom poisoning?
I'm pretty sure she didn't.
She presented to Leongatha Hospital (confirmed by Health Services) on the Sunday July 30th, went home and then returned the following day whereby she was transferred by ambulance to Monash Hospital on Monday 31st July.
That^^^ makes no sense to me that she would be sent home on that first day if anyone believed she had been poisoned like her lunch mates.
"Ms Patterson said it had not been previously reported that she was also hospitalised after the lunch with bad stomach pains and diarrhoea, and was put on a saline drip and given a "liver protective drug".
If there really was such a thing as a 'liver protective drug' for Death Cap poisoning, the other victims would not have died.

She may have had a milder case of poisoning or a stronger resilience to it.
Here is why I doubt that she had any evidence of mushroom poisoning----there were 4 others that she shared a meal with that were deathly ill. The doctors were aware of the severity of their conditions.

I have a hard time believing that she would have been released so quickly and sent home, if there was ANY signs of death cap poisoning in her system. And the only report of her being hospitalised, that I have seen, was from her.

She says she had bad stomach ache and diarrhoea[according to her] ---if so, why would they send her home, when her lunch mates were going downhill so fast? It doesn't ring true to me.

*1---There are articles talking about how Death Cap poison victims often seem to be getting better in the 1st day or so and then have sudden reversal where organs shut down. If the poison experts believed she was a victim of the same poison as the others, why let her go home alone just because she felt better? [see below]
There are studies found on google giving data on mortality rates which state the elderly are more severely affected. Also one study said elderly and also women are more affected. Perhaps due to men generally having a bigger build?
Even so, she is a 50 year old woman---are they going to let her walk out of the hospital if they think she ingested some toxic mushrooms like the 4 others that were critically ill?

From the linked study of mushroom poisoning patients in the ACT - there have been 7 mushroom poisoning patients all under the age of 47. 1 patient died (aged 46) and 6 recovered.


Ade Black
* 1 The Deathcap and Destroying Angel:

Initially they are fairly tasty when eaten and there are no effects until they start to be digested in the stomach. Then you start to get stomach cramps and vomiting along with tremendous diarrhea .
Next stage is the toxins within the mushrooms start to get into the bloodstream and carried around the body - they will eventually arrive at the liver and at a different time the kidneys where the body will attempt to process tbe toxin. However the body cannot process the toxin, the toxin does damage as it passes through liver and kidneys - the poisened host will be in considerable pain at this point and probably unable to walk as the toxin starts to liquidise both liver and kidneys (think kidney stone kind of pain) -

then the pain will go away for a while - maybe as long as two days. The host may well believe that they have /are recovering - Wrong, the toxin is still present and returns after this time-doing more liver and kidney damage this leads to death after around two weeks of very unpleasant pain-it is a horrible death as not only do the liver and kidneys get liquefied by the toxin - so do other organs wherever the blood flows - and finally there is no cure for Deathcap or Destroying Angel poisoning - you eat one you will die after around two weeks of pain.


So the next stage after stomach cramps is the critical stage where your liver and kidneys become overwhelmed with the toxins and begin to shutdown.

Are we to believe that they just sent her home ---even though they thought she had been poisoned by toxic mushrooms?
 
Last edited:
"I am now wanting to clear up the record because I have become extremely stressed and overwhelmed by the deaths of my loved ones," Ms Patterson said.

"I am now devastated to think that these mushrooms may have contributed to the illness suffered by my loved ones. I really want to repeat that I had absolutely no reason to hurt these people whom I loved."

"I now very much regret not answering some questions following this advice given the nightmare that this process has become," she said

*The word ‘now’ in these statements has bothered me. Why does she qualify her words like she has ‘now’ changed her mind? Did she not feel this way before? When exactly did she ‘now‘ recognize the severity? Is it possible she is ‘now’ feeling guilty because she only intended to make them sick so the intervention could not be completed?
 
"I am now wanting to clear up the record because I have become extremely stressed and overwhelmed by the deaths of my loved ones," Ms Patterson said.

"I am now devastated to think that these mushrooms may have contributed to the illness suffered by my loved ones. I really want to repeat that I had absolutely no reason to hurt these people whom I loved."

What an odd way to word that----..."these mushrooms may have contributed to the illness suffered by my loved ones"

Contributed? How about CAUSED the illnesses?
"I now very much regret not answering some questions following this advice given the nightmare that this process has become," she said

*The word ‘now’ in these statements has bothered me. Why does she qualify her words like she has ‘now’ changed her mind? Did she not feel this way before? When exactly did she ‘now‘ recognize the severity? Is it possible she is ‘now’ feeling guilty because she only intended to make them sick so the intervention could not be completed?
Yes, 'now' is an odd word to keep inserting---what's changed?

'NOW' I want to clear things up -[so you didn't want things to be clear previously?]

'NOW' I regret not answering some questions---<<<interesting considering this statement at the end of the article by the journalist:

"Police are continuing their investigation into the deaths, and Ms Patterson said she was willing to assist police, potentially to the extent of being re-interviewed."

WOW...So EP is now 'willing to assist police, possibly even to the " extent of being re-interviewed." <<<LOL

translation==she might help the police now, and might even possibly consider speaking to them now ...maybe...
 
"I am now wanting to clear up the record because I have become extremely stressed and overwhelmed by the deaths of my loved ones," Ms Patterson said.

"I am now devastated to think that these mushrooms may have contributed to the illness suffered by my loved ones. I really want to repeat that I had absolutely no reason to hurt these people whom I loved."

"I now very much regret not answering some questions following this advice given the nightmare that this process has become," she said

*The word ‘now’ in these statements has bothered me. Why does she qualify her words like she has ‘now’ changed her mind? Did she not feel this way before? When exactly did she ‘now‘ recognize the severity? Is it possible she is ‘now’ feeling guilty because she only intended to make them sick so the intervention could not be completed?
Appreciating her describing painful deaths, painful illness and coma, and her being questioned (rightly to protect the public if necessary) as a PROCESS…
 
"I am now wanting to clear up the record because I have become extremely stressed and overwhelmed by the deaths of my loved ones," Ms Patterson said.

"I am now devastated to think that these mushrooms may have contributed to the illness suffered by my loved ones. I really want to repeat that I had absolutely no reason to hurt these people whom I loved."

"I now very much regret not answering some questions following this advice given the nightmare that this process has become," she said

*The word ‘now’ in these statements has bothered me. Why does she qualify her words like she has ‘now’ changed her mind? Did she not feel this way before? When exactly did she ‘now‘ recognize the severity? Is it possible she is ‘now’ feeling guilty because she only intended to make them sick so the intervention could not be completed?
It seems she is making a distinction between then when she made no comment at the advice of the first lawyer and now when she got better advice from her current lawyer.
 
I'm pretty sure she didn't.

That^^^ makes no sense to me that she would be sent home on that first day if anyone believed she had been poisoned like her lunch mates.

If there really was such a thing as a 'liver protective drug' for Death Cap poisoning, the other victims would not have died.

Here is why I doubt that she had any evidence of mushroom poisoning----there were 4 others that she shared a meal with that were deathly ill. The doctors were aware of the severity of their conditions.

I have a hard time believing that she would have been released so quickly and sent home, if there was ANY signs of death cap poisoning in her system. And the only report of her being hospitalised, that I have seen, was from her.

She says she had bad stomach ache and diarrhoea[according to her] ---if so, why would they send her home, when her lunch mates were going downhill so fast? It doesn't ring true to me.

*1---There are articles talking about how Death Cap poison victims often seem to be getting better in the 1st day or so and then have sudden reversal where organs shut down. If the poison experts believed she was a victim of the same poison as the others, why let her go home alone just because she felt better? [see below]

Even so, she is a 50 year old woman---are they going to let her walk out of the hospital if they think she ingested some toxic mushrooms like the 4 others that were critically ill?



Ade Black
* 1 The Deathcap and Destroying Angel:

Initially they are fairly tasty when eaten and there are no effects until they start to be digested in the stomach. Then you start to get stomach cramps and vomiting along with tremendous diarrhea .
Next stage is the toxins within the mushrooms start to get into the bloodstream and carried around the body - they will eventually arrive at the liver and at a different time the kidneys where the body will attempt to process tbe toxin. However the body cannot process the toxin, the toxin does damage as it passes through liver and kidneys - the poisened host will be in considerable pain at this point and probably unable to walk as the toxin starts to liquidise both liver and kidneys (think kidney stone kind of pain) -

then the pain will go away for a while - maybe as long as two days. The host may well believe that they have /are recovering - Wrong, the toxin is still present and returns after this time-doing more liver and kidney damage this leads to death after around two weeks of very unpleasant pain-it is a horrible death as not only do the liver and kidneys get liquefied by the toxin - so do other organs wherever the blood flows - and finally there is no cure for Deathcap or Destroying Angel poisoning - you eat one you will die after around two weeks of pain.


So the next stage after stomach cramps is the critical stage where your liver and kidneys become overwhelmed with the toxins and begin to shutdown.

Are we to believe that they just sent her home ---even though they thought she had been poisoned by toxic mushrooms?

Everything she stated about her symptoms, hospitalisation, treatment and discharge can be and would be checked by the investigating team with the medical facilities concerned. There will either be evidence she has been truthful or evidence she has been untruthful.
 
Today marks two months since the lunch.
If it was an unintentional foraging mistake, surely EP would have come clean by now to avoid drawing out all hers and her family’s suffering.
I don’t think many would put so much on the line just to save face.
The general public has minimal information regarding Erin Patterson's interaction with investigators. Maybe she did "come clean" if there were "an unintentional foraging mistake". We don't know. This would not necessarily mean that the case is solved. It is likely that further investigation would be still be required.
JMO
 
Last edited:
Everything she stated about her symptoms, hospitalisation, treatment and discharge can be and would be checked by the investigating team with the medical facilities concerned. There will either be evidence she has been truthful or evidence she has been untruthful.
Erin’s statements sound true. Erin’s situation feels guilty. I’m still on the fence.
 
<modsnip - quoted post was snipped of insinuations against a person not named POI by LE>

But it still doesn’t explains how or why she was the only adult at the lunch who didn’t get “mushroom poisoning”.

If someone set her up, or maybe switched out her Asian dried mushrooms with Death Caps in her pantry, she still would have been poisoned if they all ate the same lunch.

IMO

Not if the 'setter up' had poisoned something else that wasn't the main meal and it was simply arbitrary that EP didn't consume whatever it was. For example, a dessert. Usually when a person cooks a large lunch for guests, they bring desserts or drinks or snacks to contribute. Even the person who wasn't able to attend may have sent a dessert or some chocolates or suchlike by way of apology.

Or the group of four had eaten snacks or drank beverages with someone else who set out to deliberately poison them all either before or after the lunch.

Or, as I have said before, one of the group of four themselves may have mistakenly prepared some form of snack that they had used foraged mushrooms in.

I guess the four hung out together on the day of the lunch both before and after, maybe even for prolonged periods, maybe to decide what to say to EP, maybe to be sociable afterwards, probably to debrief SP also, so what they may have eaten at one another's homes is also relevant.

Unless LE locates DC mushroom traces directly linked to EP, I'm not sure this case is going to make it to court. JMO MOO
 
Not if the 'setter up' had poisoned something else that wasn't the main meal and it was simply arbitrary that EP didn't consume whatever it was. For example, a dessert. Usually when a person cooks a large lunch for guests, they bring desserts or drinks or snacks to contribute. Even the person who wasn't able to attend may have sent a dessert or some chocolates or suchlike by way of apology.

Or the group of four had eaten snacks or drank beverages with someone else who set out to deliberately poison them all either before or after the lunch.

Or, as I have said before, one of the group of four themselves may have mistakenly prepared some form of snack that they had used foraged mushrooms in.

I guess the four hung out together on the day of the lunch both before and after, maybe even for prolonged periods, maybe to decide what to say to EP, maybe to be sociable afterwards, probably to debrief SP also, so what they may have eaten at one another's homes is also relevant.

Unless LE locates DC mushroom traces directly linked to EP, I'm not sure this case is going to make it to court. JMO MOO
The problem for EP is that the medical experts interrogated all 4 victims in the hospital, specifically about ANY thing they all ate and drank before they got sick.

So IF there was a side dish or dessert or beverage they all shared, the medical team knew about it. It would have been investigated if it was relevant. If it contained mushrooms it would have been mentioned already.

The chances of any of the victims bringing a mushroom dish to a Beef Wellington luncheon are pretty slim. And if they brought dessert or hot rolls or something, what are the chances they'd all be dying?

If they all had eaten snacks or beverages with someone else, the investigators would know about it already. I doubt it happened because of the timing. Maybe they all had coffee and sweet rolls that morning before they left for lunch, who knows. But the chances of that ending up mimicking death cap poisoning seems unlikely.

If they had gone to eat a meal with SP right after the lunch, the medical team would know about that already too. If any mushrooms were involved they would be focusing on that as well. Again, I think the chances are pretty slim. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
474
Total visitors
578

Forum statistics

Threads
608,255
Messages
18,236,882
Members
234,325
Latest member
davenotwayne
Back
Top