Do you really think that in the perilous environment of September 11 all the air traffic controllers abandoned their jobs to watch tv, leaving just a single person to watch all the planes? That sounds pretty implausible to me. In any case, according the Herald Sun article Erin was still in training during September 11. So she wouldn't have been the one responsible for directing plane traffic.
Additionally, it should be noted that with the time difference, the WTC collapse would have happened in the middle of the night, Australian time. Since they were still in training, the group wouldn't have been working overnight. I think the incident with Erin segregating herself would have actually happened the following day, September 12. By which time the events had pretty much all unfolded and it was mostly talking heads on tv.
What I suspect is that the instructors were needed to help deal with the aftermath, so the trainees may have been at loose ends for a day or two. While the others hung out together and watched the news, Erin chose to stay in a different room from them and not engage. (I don't really blame her for that. Lots of people needed space and time to process the events on their own terms.)
I was suggesting that maybe, actually, Ms. Patterson wasn’t watching television on Sept 11 at work, because she was working. IMO
Her former colleague apparently reported to the journalist that Erin was at work, and a lot of people go to work to do the work that they are supposed to do.
Maybe she watched television in the morning before she came to work, and then when she got home. IMO
I don’t know what kind of work tasks she had that day, I’m not an ATC, but I would suggest that she may have been off completing her tasks and not watching the television. IMO
I was kind of thinking that it her job was an air traffic controller, that one of her roles would be to deal with matters of air traffic control, so yes I was inferring that if she was at work as an air traffic controller, that she may have been performing her work duties on that day. Apologies if I did not I fully understand what actual work tasks she had on that day. I wasn’t briefed on her tasks or schedule of work projects that she had to complete on that day.
I don’t think there is any proof that I have seen that Erin was training on 11 Sept 2001 and what that training may have entailed or if she was at that point working as an ATC, controlling the air traffic.
Also, I don’t think any of this really has any baring on the alleged crime that we are discussing, which is to do with an alleged poisoning incident (or cluster of incidents) in Leongatha, Victoria, following a Beef Wellington lunch.
Someone having a job in 2001, and then allegedly committing a crime in 2023, which seems to be completely unrelated to the alleged crime, seems to me to be really quite off-topic and it doesn’t add much value, imho, it on our discussions regarding the alleged mushroom lunch at Leongatha in 2023.
All jmo