petedavo.au
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2016
- Messages
- 2,314
- Reaction score
- 1,024
Compilation of news report from 7
No conclusive fingerprints or DNA of LR was found in her car either though other than on a water bottle found in the boot & both were consistent with him drinking from it.Completely one-sided interview, which is to be expected I guess. 60 Minutes are claiming Lacco or Eades could have murdered Corryn, buried her in Kings Park and then dumped her car nearby without leaving any traces of DNA on her body/car/near the burial site?
How do you know they had no motive? Or that someone else didnt who hasn't been mentioned?And, left a hankie under her head...... and, didn't steal anything..... and, had no motive.....
Has Allon Lacco and Ivan Eades been ruled out yet?
No Cookies | Geelong Advertiser
'There's a body going in there'
Interesting playlists>
Allon Lacco
To me, the issue wasnt that "police thought of Lloyd as a suspect" within 2 days of the body being found, it was surrounding the comments by Inspector Bartels to the pathologists on 16/8/07, initially to Dr Buck & repeated to Dr Cadden before the preliminary investigation of her body that the defence thought indicative of the biased approach police took towards the investigation & particularly in relation to him.The ex-Scotland Yard guy complaining that within 2 days of Corryn's body being found, police thought of Lloyd as a suspect. What, they weren't supposed to check him out because he's too fancy to be a low-down criminal? As if men killing their wives during separations and divorces is some kind of rare occurrence. Or maybe they should have asked his permission first? The sense of entitlement is huge.
WA Police are arrogant and over-confident, especially the Major Crimes unit. They've mucked up so many cases it's ridiculous.
But police were right to investigate Lloyd Rayney. They shouldn't just take some guy's word for it that he didn't commit a crime.
Do you know if the seed pods were DNA tested to see if they came from the tree at Corryn’s home? Seems a fairly obvious step. So much talk about could have been this tree or that tree. Just test them.There were three seed pods found in Corryn's hair, and one found later in the body bag. The judge only excluded that last one because it hadn't been recorded at the time of examination and autopsy. Lloyd's lawyers said it could have been planted by police, the prosecution said it was just crappy record-keeping.
But the other two seed pods were found stuck in her hair. There are no seed pods like it in Kings Park, heaps of them all over the Rayney's yard, and one tree that has them in a far corner of the Bentley community centre. The judge ruled that it was probable that Corryn made it to her front yard at the very least, although there's very little evidence she went inside.
Discussing only one seed pod out of three is pretty bloody misleading.
Trial judgement 1st November 2012
Amen. This whole episode had some very nasty overtones. Some people wanted to take Lloyd down, and I am encouraged that Justice has won out in the end.To me, the issue wasnt that "police thought of Lloyd as a suspect" within 2 days of the body being found, it was surrounding the comments by Inspector Bartels to the pathologists on 16/8/07, initially to Dr Buck & repeated to Dr Cadden before the preliminary investigation of her body that the defence thought indicative of the biased approach police took towards the investigation & particularly in relation to him.
The recollections of the incident from all who were present, either from testimony or sworn statements is discussed in the Judgement but to paraphrase the words of Dr Cadden, Bartels after being prompted by Buck to repeat what he just told him, said "they knew it was LR who had killed her either by himself or with the help of a gay lover & that matters would roll up soon".
Bartels testified he doesnt remember saying that or even having a conversation with the pathologists. Some other police there cant recall either.
Dr Buck testified it was a long exhausting day but now recalls "someone" saying LR was a "possible suspect" and had been assisted by a "boyfriend".
Detective Casilli remembered it & I think from what he said its obvious the conversation did occur and that it was probably said in the context told by Dr Cadden. He said in a statement that "he remembers Bartell telling Buck that we are looking at Lloyd Rayney for the murder & that he might have done it with his lover". He recalls Buck then telling Cadden "you wont believe this but Stuey (Bartels) just said they think Lloyd Rayney and his lover are responsible for Corryns death".
Theres further issues that arose from those comments all discussed in the judgement but it does appear to me from numerous things the police said and did that their opinion from the outset was that LR was guilty & they pursued him as such. Whether that was to the detriment of the case or not may lie with the fact no one has been found guilty of her murder, or it may not.
We can only speculate about what other enquiries police made or if the investigation was thorough, but considering the judges comments in relation to the case the prosecution put forth, it appears not. He said "in addition to failing to prove its scenarios, the state has failed to disprove any alternative explanation consistent with the accused being innocent".
In February 2016, Rayney was cleared by the State Administrative Tribunal of the alleged "unlawful destruction of evidence and/or an attempt to pervert the course of justice" and his right to practise was reinstated.
Death of Corryn Rayney - Wikipedia