LegallyBrunette
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2012
- Messages
- 1,777
- Reaction score
- 4
<modsnip>
Just re the "Get out of here" evidence; while I initially assumed it was Jill, the more I think about it, the more I think it may have been a third party, perhaps another resident nearby, hearing the scuffling or commotion, in the laneway. If in fact it WAS that phrase. And of course we don't know just how non-English speaking the witnesses are. The fact that they needed an interpreter just suggests that they have difficulties with the language and in particular, the language that may be used in court. Hence the interpreter. But many people can actually understand the language better than they can express it.
I can understand French and German, for example, WAY better than I can speak it. And if I heard a single phrase, repeated, I could probably recall it pretty accurately - even if I didn't know what it meant.
However, I agree that that piece of evidence - in isolation - poses as many questions as it may answer.
I tend to think it was Jill, saying 'get out of there'. 'There' being somewhere intimate he shouldn't have been. Looking at the new cctv footage, she was pretty heavily intoxicated, she may not have realised the attack for what it was at first, thinking it's just some guy trying to take liberties. :twocents: