Found Deceased Australia - Karen Ristevski, 47, Melbourne, Vic, 29 June 2016 - #5

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks Steve. This is what I alluded to in my post up thread. If there was CCTV of Karen the morning she disappeared, it would certainly have been published.

A resident of Essex Close stated via MSM that police had asked for their CCTV footage in the hope that it may have shown Karen walking down Oakley Drive. Nothing came of that.

She did not go for a walk.
 
Totally agree Armchair snoop, that is exactly what the police are doing. That doesn't translate to executing a smear campaign against any POI's or associates. Me thinks that some of the Ristevski's protest too much.

They will also be looking at the statements family members have made to MSM, these statements will also give them a bit of an insight (look our VR). The best weapon an investigator has is 'their gut feeling' and I'm pretty sure they know who it is, they just need to gather as much evidence as they can to make the charge stick. The clock is ticking, tick toc tick toc.
 
im guessing SR lives with her parents. Is that a fact ? Kids stay at home a lot longer these days so I'm guessing she does but I can't find any definitive reference that she does.
 
Im sure SR's phone would have been looked at?
 
SR as we have seen.

And VR even though hes made claims, there are genuine suspicious around his businesses.

Do your research its back in the threads

With all due respect unit can you be a bit clearer in what direction you are going ? Lay it on the table and tell us what you think happened. I'm confused ?
 
BR has had to do a lot of back tracking on his version as evidence emerges, however do we know why he came forth so quickly to admit to an argument? Why didn't he give the impression all was rosy and she simply went for a pre-work walk which would better fit his "evil predator" theory? The fact he's admitted to the argument proves there were raised tempers at the time of her disappearance. Is he covering bases because someone saw/ heard arguments?
 
:laughcry: :floorlaugh: I'm dying here

Sorry!

q49ReET.jpg
 
BR has had to do a lot of back tracking on his version as evidence emerges, however do we know why he came forth so quickly to admit to an argument? Why didn't he give the impression all was rosy and she simply went for a pre-work walk which would better fit his "evil predator" theory? The fact he's admitted to the argument proves there were raised tempers at the time of her disappearance. Is he covering bases because someone saw/ heard arguments?

Excellent question !! Maybe he said that to make himself look totally transparent and open.
 
SR as we have seen.

And VR even though hes made claims, there are genuine suspicious around his businesses.

Do your research its back in the threads

I don't think VR did it but I do believe he could an 'accessary after the fact'
 
With all due respect unit can you be a bit clearer in what direction you are going ? Lay it on the table and tell us what you think happened. I'm confused ?

Thought i had. ..

Although BR claims an argument the 29th, i say it was the 28th.

In all of this im concluding that Borce is covering for Sarah.

I have alluded to this before.

Sometimes you must be guarded on what you say.....................................................................................................................................................................
 
https://goo.gl/maps/j2Tb14ypfc32
What about this site? For some reason, I'm stuck on Koroirot Creek. See the old bridge there? There is a wire fence at the front from the road, but shortly after the creek, there is an entrance to a property with the gate open. If you turn left there and go in, you could get to the creek and that old broken derelict bridge.
My first screen shot. Fingers crossed it works.

Dropped pin
near Kororoit Creek K37 Streamside Reserve, Victoria
https://goo.gl/maps/F338w4QXFC72

ETA: Can anyone tell me how to add a screenshot?! Please?!
 
Thought i had. ..

Although BR claims an argument the 29th, i say it was the 28th.

In all of this im concluding that Borce is covering for Sarah.

I have alluded to this before.

Sometimes you must be guarded on what you say.....................................................................................................................................................................

So you're saying Sarah killed her mother ? Anything is possible but that's a big call
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
66
Guests online
143
Total visitors
209

Forum statistics

Threads
608,637
Messages
18,242,745
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top