Andieinsyd
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2016
- Messages
- 447
- Reaction score
- 3,367
Folbigg’s pardon yet another alarm bell for how science is used in the justice system
“Folbigg’s case is further evidence of rotting foundations. The system relies on non-independent experts and non-expert judges and jurors, and continues to give great weight to science that has been called into question.”
“There is no requirement on the state, when it calls scientific and expert evidence in criminal proceedings, that the technique be validated and reliable,” says Professor Gary Edmond, a member of the Council of the Australian Academy of Forensic Sciences.”
“Folbigg’s case is further evidence of rotting foundations. The system relies on non-independent experts and non-expert judges and jurors, and continues to give great weight to science that has been called into question.”
“There is no requirement on the state, when it calls scientific and expert evidence in criminal proceedings, that the technique be validated and reliable,” says Professor Gary Edmond, a member of the Council of the Australian Academy of Forensic Sciences.”