3llecia
NDAs & Secrets
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 139
- Reaction score
- 724
This case hasn't been discussed on WS before (as far as I can find.)
Taxi driver Peter Szitovszky’s murder outside his Wheeler's Hill home in 2004 was described as an “attack that was frenzied and showed great anger.” His son Chris was found guilty and sought leave to appeal an 18 year sentence. He was acquitted in 2009.
The killing occurred between 3 and 4 am on 1 July 2004;
The deceased was killed near the front door of his home;
An axe was used by the killer to inflict about 14 blows in an attack that was frenzied and showed great anger;
The first and possibly the second blow with the axe was struck when the deceased was standing;
The Applicant had the opportunity to inflict the wounds because he was present at the house at the time the deceased was killed;
Neighbours heard an argument between two males between 3.00 and 4.00 am;
Two neighbours gave a description of a person they saw involved in the altercation
Shane Taylor – the person was wearing a beanie with thick brown horizontal stripes, a white hooded windcheater, dark long pants roughly 180 cm tall, medium build and aged in his early to mid 20’s;
Michael John Pitts – male aged mid twenties with medium build, fringe stuck up at front with hair gel and his hair was fairly short and dark; wearing a white windcheater that looked baggy and dark pants.
Neither witness recognised the man or could make an identification;
Paul Edward Chase attended the scene and described the Applicant as approximately 170 cm, aged 20, short dark hair, medium build, wearing a green T-shirt and black track pants;
It was alleged by the Crown that there was animosity between the Applicant and the deceased which was based primarily on statements made by the Applicant to Mr. Woodcock;
Further, the Prosecutor suggested there was resentment that carried through to the time of the killing;
Further, it was put before the jury that the victim did not have set patterns of behaviour (the implication being that no one could lie in wait to kill him);
The victim had no known enemies.
The above is cross-posted from Dr Bob Moles’ Networked Knowledge site.
The appeal led to Chris being acquitted due to an “unsafe and unsatisfactory” verdict. There was no forensic evidence and the prosecution’s case was entirely circumstantial.
Victoria Police say they won't reopen the case without further evidence.
Taxi driver Peter Szitovszky’s murder outside his Wheeler's Hill home in 2004 was described as an “attack that was frenzied and showed great anger.” His son Chris was found guilty and sought leave to appeal an 18 year sentence. He was acquitted in 2009.
The killing occurred between 3 and 4 am on 1 July 2004;
The deceased was killed near the front door of his home;
An axe was used by the killer to inflict about 14 blows in an attack that was frenzied and showed great anger;
The first and possibly the second blow with the axe was struck when the deceased was standing;
The Applicant had the opportunity to inflict the wounds because he was present at the house at the time the deceased was killed;
Neighbours heard an argument between two males between 3.00 and 4.00 am;
Two neighbours gave a description of a person they saw involved in the altercation
Shane Taylor – the person was wearing a beanie with thick brown horizontal stripes, a white hooded windcheater, dark long pants roughly 180 cm tall, medium build and aged in his early to mid 20’s;
Michael John Pitts – male aged mid twenties with medium build, fringe stuck up at front with hair gel and his hair was fairly short and dark; wearing a white windcheater that looked baggy and dark pants.
Neither witness recognised the man or could make an identification;
Paul Edward Chase attended the scene and described the Applicant as approximately 170 cm, aged 20, short dark hair, medium build, wearing a green T-shirt and black track pants;
It was alleged by the Crown that there was animosity between the Applicant and the deceased which was based primarily on statements made by the Applicant to Mr. Woodcock;
Further, the Prosecutor suggested there was resentment that carried through to the time of the killing;
Further, it was put before the jury that the victim did not have set patterns of behaviour (the implication being that no one could lie in wait to kill him);
The victim had no known enemies.
The above is cross-posted from Dr Bob Moles’ Networked Knowledge site.
The appeal led to Chris being acquitted due to an “unsafe and unsatisfactory” verdict. There was no forensic evidence and the prosecution’s case was entirely circumstantial.
Victoria Police say they won't reopen the case without further evidence.