SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,724
- Reaction score
- 180,781
Could you please give some explanation as to just how you came to the conclusion it was an impossibility that the shot that killed CC was not accidental? Have you personally really subjected the alleged scene photographs to indepth scrutiny, or are you relying on what has been reported (in written form) in the media? I personally can recall the ballistics 'expert' giving an answer to DD during his evidence, that included the word "plausible". IMO
If you go back in the thread, I posted a pic of the required angle to have killed Carol in the way in which he said she was killed. Also, you will need to read (or listen to) Greg Lynn's description of the "struggle".
Last edited: