SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,992
- Reaction score
- 183,467
To be fair, in my opinion zero and none, means the same thing.
No lies and zero lies means the same thing.
Not that I believe him, I don't
(Just jumping off your post)
I think it is just really hard to be fair about what Dann is saying now.
He participated in a trial for his client.
He had achieved getting a lot of evidence thrown out.
The judge ruled multiple times in his favour (thank goodness, because that helps against an appeal being accepted).
The judge ruled so much in his favour that we all started wondering what the heck was going on.
Now Dann is having a big whinge because sub judice is over, and all of the dirt about his client is legally allowed to be published.
No doubt he is still trying to do his best for his client, but it all does sound a little preposterous because a KC certainly knows all of the sub judice and other laws. I think Dann probably doesn't have a lot to work with - just attack, attack, attack, and hope for the best.
imo