me either. It is like the jury thought the fact they SURVIVED meant there was no intent. I find this devastating as a woman. So he was just hitting her on the head with a hammer, and he had all those weapons in his pants just because.... He intended to "harm" but not kill them... And then drive them home safe! This is ludicrous.
Yep. Ludicrous alright. As someone said earlier, was the jury on happy gas or what?
Told Mr. Laserdisc when he arrived home that the Salt Creek Psycho escaped the attempted-murder charge and he didn't believe me. That's because the extremely strange media for some reason (all branches I saw) have flourished as headline, 'Salt Creek Attacker Found Guilty'
Had to explain to Mr. Laserdisc that headline was deliberately misleading, imo, and why
Seems South Oz jurors might have found Salt Creek Psycho guilty of attempted murder
IF the victims had died -- but there's no guarantee they would have found him guilty even then
South Australia's 'establishment' needs to catch up. It's not 1950 or 1850 any more. What happens in South Australia no longer stays in South Australia. We have internet now. People
know about SA and have done for a long time. The reputation of that place stinks and it's bringing Australia down. It needs a good exorcism. But they're so arrogant and slow to learn, as this latest example of suppression and hanky panky illustrates
I don't believe they found less than 100 incriminating items on his computer
I don't believe jurors elsewhere in the world would have reached the same conclusion as the South Oz jurors in this case
And I'm disgusted