I get confused with this? Are we not allowed to sleuth anyone on social media or just family members? As WT family members are the ones that took him to Kendall then anyone else should not be classed as family members.
I get confused with this? Are we not allowed to sleuth anyone on social media or just family members? As WT family members are the ones that took him to Kendall then anyone else should not be classed as family members.
Maybe this
A truck driver had noticed a black camry in the area several times last Friday.
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/police-st...yrell-3-turns-up-nothing-20140919-10j9tj.html
if forensics find nothing from the spedding search to implicate him in the disappearance of william, would it be police procedure to hold a press conference to say the search turned up nothing of interest? would it also mean if they dont announce anything that their silence to the media means they do have something of interest theyre working on for hopefully an arrest?
or would spedding be notified privately if there was nothing and he could then tell msm himself if he chose to?
surely the computer has been checked by now, unless files have been hidden and require specialist techs
so would not hearing anything about their forensic results mean they have found something? or wont we know either way, unless there is an arrest?
Another thought, perhaps the police do have an idea of who took him and are biding their time, hoping the person gets lazy and comes out of hiding.
What I can't understand is if the police had information about the caravan not long after WT went missing, then why wasn't it raided sooner.
Normally when you stay in a caravan park you have to by law declare how many occupants will be staying for fire hazard reasons. So was the caravan park owners told only 2 adults where staying for the week or did they declare a child would be there as well??
I just wanted to bump this post from Amee back in Thread 2, as it may have some significance (BBM).
Originally Posted by Amee
Here is another version.
Theyve been interviewing known sex *offenders in the area, in nearby towns and in caravan parks.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/subs...type=anonymous
Unfortunately, the Australian article is now subscriber only - though it wasn't at the time.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-NSW-12th-Sept-2014-2&p=10987443#post10987443
I was actually looking for an old post about the police having contacted known sex offenders, but there was one they couldn't find. I am almost positive that I read that here quite a while ago. But I can't find the post. :sigh:
So I wonder if a known sex offender resides at the same caravan park that was searched recently?Maybe the caravan park was checked earlier, SD. But possibly it was too late to see the people that had a small child with them who was crying. Or maybe the small child had been passed along already .. or wasn't crying any more and was out of sight.
Just bumping my post from earlier in the thread.
Drug raid in Laurieton By Mark Gallagher April 3, 2014, noon
This caravan park isn't so squeaky clean.....
A 23-year-old resident of Camden Haven's Christmas Cove Caravan Park has been refused bail and will appear in court in Port Macquarie on Friday, April 4, to face a number of charges relating to drugs and other alleged offences, following a police raid on Thursday morning.
http://www.camdencourier.com.au/story/2195131/updated-photos-drug-raid-in-laurieton/
Drug raid in Laurieton By Mark Gallagher April 3, 2014, noon
This caravan park isn't so squeaky clean.....
A 23-year-old resident of Camden Haven's Christmas Cove Caravan Park has been refused bail and will appear in court in Port Macquarie on Friday, April 4, to face a number of charges relating to drugs and other alleged offences, following a police raid on Thursday morning.
http://www.camdencourier.com.au/story/2195131/updated-photos-drug-raid-in-laurieton/