Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - # 4

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
newone said:
interesting article-- must be a local paper? lots of detail unheard ...
Click to expand...

the article says WS story had inconsistencies, so instead of obtain a warrant to check his phone log history, they search his office & home??
am i missing something!?
 
Makara said:
Photo posted on 23 July 2012 of a few generations including a baby named William. Father would be IS, grandfather BS. This baby has that same surname in this photo. From what I can see there is no further mention of this child or IS. The date stamp of the photo is 09-10-2??? WT was born in June 2011.
https://www.facebook.com/bill.spedding.9#!/bill.spedding.9
Click to expand...


If you look closer, it's not 09 10 2 - it's 95 10 2 = 2nd Oct 1995.
 
butterstick said:
OK question.

At this point, with a little boy missing for so long, is there really any benefit in hiding his background? Or keeping his guardians from talking to the media?

Could it help at all to open up?

Or would it just bring unnecessary and distracting attention?
Click to expand...

I don't think it would help, personally just because the foster family appear to not be involved and must be suffering terribly. I think focus on the bio mum was kind of warranted because she carried on with life as though nothing had happened. She has other kids in her care so why was William removed? i am interested though - in wether he was visiting his biological grandmother or the mother of his foster mum. His grandmother may not have been able to care for him (ill health) but still wanted to see him, so foster family have taken him to visit. Which begs the question of who knew he was there and who didn't.
 
Makara said:
Photo posted on 23 July 2012 of a few generations including a baby named William. Father would be IS, grandfather BS. This baby has that same surname in this photo. From what I can see there is no further mention of this child or IS. The date stamp of the photo is 09-10-2??? WT was born in June 2011.
https://www.facebook.com/bill.spedding.9#!/bill.spedding.9
Click to expand...

Is the year on that photo not 1999? Maybe it's my eyes but it looks like 99-10-2? Plus the photo looks from around that time IMO the clothing and the age of the photo itself
 
Sazza said:
the article says WS story had inconsistencies, so instead of obtain a warrant to check his phone log history, they search his office & home??
am i missing something!?
Click to expand...

LE took Grandma (WT) phone too.....article ((jpeg)) indicated that WS said he had a missed call from WTGram....no record of same....on WS log....payment made at café EFTPOS--those details were absent in MSM past few days -- have been trying to locate this paper online (guessing it is local) have not found it yet.


upthread ((SouthAussie )) post indicates that cell phones were being examined by LE too - again just finding this out now
 
RE: Media and BS and MS

Just putting it out there: Thank GOD there was no Granny Pash. :drumroll:

(ABC threaders would get it) :laughing:
 
The thread is back open for posting.

Please leave the FB discussion on FB, don't bring it here.

Also, taking screen shots from FB is not allowed.

Social Networks

Regarding Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and other social networking or blog websites: Links may be used to direct posters to view something on a social networking page. But postings on social networking sites are not considered fact; they are rumor. Copying and pasting, or taking screen caps, directly from these pages is not allowed. Paraphrasing is okay. (Exception: If the Twitter or Facebook post belongs to a verified news station, it may be copied. But a link should still be provided.)

Also, social networking pages may only be linked if they are directly related to a case, i.e. the victim or suspect. We don't want to post to someone's mother, brother, employer, milkman, or postal carrier just because they know the main player. We also NEVER link to minor's pages (unless they are the victim). And be sure that the page actually belongs to the person being discussed. Do not link to someone if you are not 100% sure it is the correct person. And if a social networking is set to private and you get in the back way, you may not post what you find. Private means private!

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...iquette-amp-Information&p=8364858#post8364858

When posting a picture from the media, please link to the original source.

Discussing &/or sleuthing William's family will not be tolerated.

Thank you
 
Thanks for cleaning up the thread.

Off topic: is the thank you button missing for anybody else?
 
Sazza said:
the article says WS story had inconsistencies, so instead of obtain a warrant to check his phone log history, they search his office & home??
am i missing something!?
Click to expand...


Because they have not reported that they have checked his phone history on reports obtained from his service provider does not mean it has not been done. In fact, it is a pretty standard move - so I would think that it has been done, and that (among other things) has led to the searches of his physical properties. They had to have darn good solid reasons to get the search warrants for his properties. And they aren't going to inform us about what those reasons were.
 
Tootsie, the article appears to be for subscribers only. Do you mind letting us know a couple of the details contained in the article?
 
Oh sorry, I viewed it ok by opening in private window, firefox.
It sometimes works by googling the headline.

The headline is "Suspicion torments NSW community as police probe toddler’s disappearance"
I don't really like to post what's there without it being linked.
 
Thanks Tootsie. So, after googling the headline and reading the full article it seems that the media had Spedding's name right from the get-go. but decided not to run it. But when Spedding was named a POI that all changed.


"On Wednesday, when media arrived to report on the case, most news organisations quickly had Spedding’s name, but chose not to run it. "

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...rs-disappearance/story-e6frg6z6-1227195227854
 
I just had an awful feeling, like a cold wave that went over me. Really weird. But it went along with the thought that William did run off and hide and got stuck somewhere and unable to call out :(

But how could that be, everywhere has been searched. And dogs have searched.
I think it was just seeing one of the search pics and how high the undergrowth of brackens etc was.

I suppose I don't want someone to have done something to him :(
 
You know that is not so silly Tootsie because I do not think sniffer dogs are perfect, is it possible they just didn't find him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is DeKalb County John Doe (2022)?

Members online

... and 145 more.
Total: 1,986 (members: 146, guests: 1,840)

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
1,840
Total visitors
1,986
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
602,446
Messages
18,140,570
Members
231,395
Latest member
HelpingHandz
Back
Top