SLouTh
In a world where you can be anything, be kind!
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 4,427
- Reaction score
- 35,120
TBH …. I don’t think even disposing of shoes makes any sense …. Because putting all of the info we have together… I think the drive occurred before FF arrived home…. And Police hadn’t even been notified at that time that William was missing …. So it would make no difference if he was wearing shoes or not… ????But this is just my opinion ….Well that's a surprise isn't it, not!! There are certain questions that keep getting avoided, over the years, wouldn't want to upset the narrative, would we?
It's likely whatever was disposed of (possibly the shoes) on Batar Creek Rd was possibly removed later on. I mean they were never considered persons of interest in that first week or subsequent weeks. There's no way the FFC took William down to the riding school and attempted to dispose of him, that's the stuff of make-believe.
IMO, the purpose for driving on Batar Creek Rd was to simply remove evidence, it had nothing to do with checking to see if a 3yr old walked that far. Again I ask the question; why didn't she turn left out of Benaroon Drive onto Batar Creek Rd? If she was checking if he walked down there, why only right? That's why her story has never added up, nor do the time stamps or anything after 10 o'clock.
Have all the theories been tested, that's again, a $1m question.
Not checking left on Batar Creek Road, makes as much sense as not driving up and down Ellendale Cres ….to look for William … IMO