momtective
Lifetime WS Non-Mod
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2008
- Messages
- 11,995
- Reaction score
- 30
Bringing over my ever so feeble attempt at Gabriel in pink. He is just gorgeous as a boy or a girl...just an absolutely beautiful baby.
I'm trying to understand the baby broker angle. I don't see any evidence of it.
Could some of those of you who think this is this the case give me a couple of the things that you're thinking are evidence of the Smiths brokering multiple babies?
Thanks!
I have to agree with another poster, now that I think about it. I think the Smith's were going to take Gabriel in, as their "adopted" sibling for H. The plan got screwed up, however, when Logan wouldn't sign paperwork, & was awarded custody of Gabriel. I don't think Gabriel is with another family. Would be nice if I'm wrong.
I'm trying to understand the baby broker angle. I don't see any evidence of it.
Could some of those of you who think this is this the case give me a couple of the things that you're thinking are evidence of the Smiths brokering multiple babies?
Thanks!
Do we know yet what NG is talking about tonight?
I'm sorry to say that I agree with you. I think EJ's options had run out on her and she did the unthinkable.
I would love to know where she went during those 2 hours that the babysitter was with Gabriel. Anyone have a clue?
Also, I was at work all day, what lies was the babysitter caught in?
Do we know yet what NG is talking about tonight?
wow her attorney is a smith.
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.g...rtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR2009-008392
search for case: CR2009-008392-001
attorney: Smith,xxxxxxx
Who is her court appointed attorney?
idk. is that who this is? On her other case number it says public defendant s.e.
OHHHH maybe SE means SouthEast Maricopa County. For some reason I thought S.E. were the initials of the defender
I don't know if anyone has posted this yet:
12/17/09 paternity and temporary custody order: http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Family%20Court/012010/m4037032.pdf
It appears that, regardless of whatever she put in the documents she filed with the court, Elizabeth did agree on 12/17/09 that Logan was Gabriel's natural father.
At that time, an order of JOINT custody was entered, under which the parents would split parenting time until the final custody hearing (which was to have taken place in March 2010). Pursuant to the order, Logan's parenting time would have started Sunday Dec. 20, 2009 at 8:00 am. Gabriel would have been returned to Elizabeth Wednesday, Dec. 23, 2009 at 8:00 a.m.--and so on switching on Sundays and Wednesdays until the trial.
Logan filed a motion to enforce the (joint) custody order on Dec. 21st. And, as we know, a hearing was scheduled for the 28th, at which Elizabeth did not show and Logan was granted sole custody.
Sorry lol. I must be confused. I thought you posted EJ's attorney as a "Smith". If it's V Smith, she's defending someone now with the "mental illness" defense.
http://www.abc15.com/content/news/p...mera-worker-weeps/toJ8AVQugUqGeuMEys49Og.cspx
Went to Library for PC