Wintersdawn
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2010
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 0
Good point. Kind of the opposite of what I was thinking, but you may be on to something. I was just thinking that if they take this long for a possible homicide, which you'd think would be priority, could you imagine how long it would take for a case of accidental death?
I would think that NOT putting a rush on a homicide case just because the family involved is trash (for lack of a better term) would be discriminatory. You'd think they'd have to follow some sort of protocol regardless of the situation.
Im sure it totally discriminatory, but that doesnt mean it doesnt influence some of the decision making. A rush is pretty expensive, im betting they dont rush all homicides. Its probably only rushed if their is a need. at$525.00 per sample, protocal probably requires a reason for the rush, things like upcoming court dates, media pressure, societal dangers, and risk of a suspect fleeing. Sylars case doesnt have any of these. If a detective were compassionate with a family, I could see him finding a way to work around protocal to get those results. But I dont see them willing to stick out their necks for either of the families that are in this case by requesting a rush.