fran
Former Member
Fran,
"Yes I am entitled to my own opinion. With only 1/4 of the evidence revealed, it's beyond me how anyone could possibly declare this child guilty without knowing what the other 3/4 of the evidence is."
Yes...........and I am entitled to my own opinion as well and what you say is counter opposing to your argument imo.
You say we cant possibly declare him guilty with only 1/4 of the evidence revealed but yet you can declare him innocent and state this is some vast conspiracy to get a 9 year old boy, even without knowing what the other 3/4 of the evidence is and proclaim that there is some wild killer on the loose somewhere.:waitasec:
If I recall you have given your opinion quite often based only on 1/4 of the information that has been revealed. Everyone is entitled to their opinions and they do not have to agree.
Not one thing known points away from this boy.
imoo
Do you have a link where I declared this child is innocent?
Contrary to those that believe this child guilty, I've always said I don't know. I believe he's POSSIBLY innocent AND I do not believe they've shown him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
FWIW, IF as you say there's not one thing that's known pointing away from the boy, that must be the reason for our difference of opinion. We're looking at different cases.... I see a number of KNOWN FACTS that point away from the child. That's what is difficult for those who question the child's guilt to reach an educated conclusion, because there's NO indication that the 'other possibilities' have been fully investigated.
There are those who need to know the answers to questions before they commit themselves to a position and there's those who ASSUME to know the answers or avoid the questionable issues and hope they disappear. This pros has found a way to make them disappear, IMHO, by sealing the records.
TIA
fran