I wonder if she was wearing it not because she had eye surgery but because they made good sunglasses? Was it confirmed that the glasses belong to her?Would a doctor perform eye surgery on a pregnant lady?
I wonder if she was wearing it not because she had eye surgery but because they made good sunglasses? Was it confirmed that the glasses belong to her?Would a doctor perform eye surgery on a pregnant lady?
I believe the $64,000 question is how she got there. There were no abandoned cars nearby. Plus, a missing pregnant woman in the woods would be all over the news. I think she was abandoned and left to die by the person who took her there.
I guess I assumed that this woman died of dehydration but do we know the actual cause? It was always my assumption for some reason that she was alive when she was dropped off in the location she was found. But now I am wondering if she may have been dropped off at this location after death....
I wonder if she was wearing it not because she had eye surgery but because they made good sunglasses? Was it confirmed that the glasses belong to her?
I don't know how the glasses were traced to that particular eye clinic. Presumably the name was printed on them somewhere. I would also assume the clinic was contacted and they were unable to trace them to a former patient.
My uncle had cataract surgery and wore the glasses he was issued for the rest of his life because the offered good protection against future cataracts.
If these glasses we for cataract surgery, our jane Doe was kind of young. Perhaps they were issued to someone else and given to her. Many possibilities.
She was found on a ledge halfway up a steep canyon wall. It was not vertical but very steep. It would have been virtually impossible to transport a body to that location without a helicopter. The rim of the canyon was accessible only with a 4WD and, as I have explained, very difficult to descend. The base of the canyon had an easy trail from the parking area. I think there is little doubt she starte on the bottom and went up on her own volition.
Her body was fully skeletonized but there was no broken bones or other evidence of trauma. Snakes hibernate during cold weather. Most likely she died of exposure.
I found a website that has quite a bit of information about this woman and how she was found. It includes an image of a local newspaper article that indicates they don't know how she died but it doesn't appear to have been complications of pregnancy. Also a couple of blurry but slightly different photos of the reconstruction.
http://yavapaisw.com/unidentified-victims/ and scroll down to the second entry.
Dewey 46 miles
Prescott- 40 miles
Prescott Valley 27.8 miles
Cottonwood- 4 Miles **decent sized city**
Yarnell- 78.6 miles
Mayer- 50 miles
Ash Fork- 76
Sedona- 23 Miles
Sedona has a lot of tourism, lots of traffic. It is one of the most beautiful places ever no joke.
It is also good to consider this area of Az does have many issues with wildfires. Does anyone want to look if they had a wildfire around the time or where the body was found?
Prescott and Prescott Valley are two places, Prescott is a county seat larger population. Cottonwood, its a medium sized city but smaller than Prescott, but definitely could of come from there. The other cities are fairly small within the consideration of Sedona.
Anymore of Az questions just holler!
I don't think Jane Doe was from AZ. What I meant is that maybe Jane Doe found herself stranded on the ledge, her partner went for help. Whilst looking for help, something happened to the partner i.e. car crash. If this was the case, then I would assume that it happened near the canyon site. Therefore, it leaves these people:
3. Daniel M Thompson
Cottonwood, Yavapai County, Arizona
January 27, 1953 - February 27, 1995
Age: 42
6. Roy A Richardson
Cottonwood, Yavapai County, Arizona
December 09, 1954 - January 07, 1995
Age: 40
17. Stephen A Maybee
Cottonwood, Yavapai County, Arizona
March 11, 1960 - November 09, 1994
Age: 34
Dumb question: if we know these men are dead, wouldn't their surviving friends and family know if they also had a significant other who was missing?
I don't think it's a dumb question. It looks as if Jane Doe was never reported missing by her family or friends which is astonishing. Maybe any one of those men were not close to their family enough for them to know that there was a pregnant woman in the picture. Another answer is maybe any one of those men were not her SO; maybe a family member or friend who took her out for one last crazy retreat before submitting to the demands of motherhood. I even thought about including women who died within the same time and location too.
Perhaps... the U.I.D. was abducted, held for along period of time (months or years, even), all-the-while being sexually abused/raped by her abductor(s).
Perhaps... the U.I.D. was not pregnant at the time of her abduction, but became pregnant during her captivity.
Perhaps... as she neared the end of the pregnancy, the abductor decided it was easier for him to dispose of her before she gave birth, rather than have to deal with an infant, etc.
Thanks. And we should consider any unidentified people found in the same area after 1994-5, if someone hasn't already looked through them.
I emailed those three names to the regional admin. From what she said, it sounded like they may already have identified her though.
Are you referring to our Jane Doe?
Yes. She said they had a "very good match" that they were looking at when I submitted my information. I got the vibe that she was saying "thanks but we're about to solve the case anyways." Furthermore, she couldn't give any information so I wonder if this is a murder case.