MOMto5
"Nana" to one
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2008
- Messages
- 1,370
- Reaction score
- 0
No surprise - just more of what I already posted on another thread: trying to poison the future jury pool into thinking that they have some "right" to be there.
These experts who are behaving this way, along with J Baez and his crew, are simply trying to sway the FUTURE JURORS who may be watching any video or news reports of these events into THINKING that they, J Baez and his crew, SHOULD HAVE been allowed access, ergo possibly getting them a leg up with the future jurors.
Not that I think it will help (cause I don't, since the nation is watching the events and proceedings and likely knows what the judge ruled) but I guarantee you this is why they are acting this way. ITA it's unprofessional, to say the least, since J Baez, for one, knows darn well he'd never be able to get any such argument/testimony in front of the future jury (Judge S would shut that down IMMEDIATELY in light of his rulings DENYING any such access!)
I totally agree. I was wondering about this yesterday. I, myself, was not sure if a defense team had a right to examine the crime scene along with LE. I did not think so, and certainly understand and agree with the judge's decision, but the point is, I was pretty much clueless. Thanks to the posters here, I found the answer rather quickly. I am assuming that I am not the only one that did not know the answer, and it is worrisome that many others may not understand and see this as some big controversial conspiracy by LE against KC. Definately an attempt to taint the jury pool.