Garda Canty agreed that he made his first statement in relation to what he saw at Fawnagowan in November 2018, five and a half years after he visited the farm.
He said he made the statement using notes he had written at the time. He further accepted that he did not mention the hair clip in his statement or his written notes.
The witness also accepted that the garda exhibits chart stated that the tamper evident bag contained cable ties, a hair clip, tubing and pipe cover while the chart disclosed to the defence stated only that there were cable ties and pipe covers in the bag.
Under reexamination Gda Canty told Mr Bowman that he had nothing to do with retrieving, bagging, marking or charting the contents of the bag.
Detective Garda Sharon Langan of the ballistics section of the Garda Technical Bureau told Mr Bowman that she visited the farm at Fawnagowan on April 30, 2013.
When she looked into the tank she saw what she thought was a body lying face down in water or effluent.
She watched as it was removed from the tank by firefighters wearing bio-hazard suits. Once the body had been removed it was laid on a sheet of plastic and wrapped up.
It was “fairly decomposed”, she said, and she noted a gold watch but no clothes.
The following day she attended a post mortem carried out by Dr Khalid Jaber who handed her samples including muscle tissue, the watch, bone marrow, head hair, a maggot and a tooth. She bagged each of these so they could be delivered to forensic scientists for examination.
She also examined the deceased’s Citroen van and agreed with Mr Staines that since Mr Ryan’s disappearance the van had been used in an RTE Crimecall programme and was also returned to the deceased’s son Robert Ryan Jnr. As a result, she said she was not optimistic about finding relevant evidence from it.
She further told Mr Staines that she could remember a large concrete lid being removed from the tank by a JCB and she remembered seeing the lid crack. She didn’t make a note of the crack, she said, and didn’t mention it in her statement. Mr Staines asked her if the removal of the lid was a significant event on the day and the witness replied: “no”.
Mr Staines said that everyone present knew that a body had been found in the tank and the decision was made to take the lid off in the hope that it would be done as efficiently as possible and with the least amount of destruction possible.
“So when it shattered it would have been to the forefront of the minds of those watching,” he said.
The witness said she doesn’t remember and agreed that it is not mentioned in her notes.
Mr Staines suggested there would have been dust and pieces breaking off, rocks and pebbles falling into the tank.
He again asked if this was not a significant event that she would remember. Det Gda Langan replied: “I’m sorry, I really don’t.” The witness added that she was not aware if the deceased’s arm came away during the efforts to retrieve him from the tank.
Woman's hair clip and bone fragments found in tank where body was found