Madeleine74
Knower of Things
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
- Messages
- 11,556
- Reaction score
- 20,081
What would be relevant to his wife's murder in 2008, when Calgary is referring to incident(s) that occurred before he even met Nancy? That Brad didn't want to have to pay a civil judgment that went against him? That said, BC apparently had one or more past legal issues.
Two things that did become known as a result of his deposition and most importantly the resulting affidavit filed by the former fiance who became aware of the lies told during that depo and felt compelled to set the record straight, is that Brad had a subversive side as well as a stalkery side, which fully emerged when the ex-fiance was done and finished with him and the relationship. Had this ex been put on the stand to testify, it's likely behavior patterns exhibited by BC from their time together would have come out in testimony and that would have corroborated behavior patterns testified to in the trial by those closest to NC, which related to the year or so before her murder. Slippery slope that. I saw some red flags in BC's behaviors when I read the affidavit and thought it very good fortune the ex-fiance got away. Probably would be deemed too prejudicial for a jury to hear, but it does add to the whole picture.
Two things that did become known as a result of his deposition and most importantly the resulting affidavit filed by the former fiance who became aware of the lies told during that depo and felt compelled to set the record straight, is that Brad had a subversive side as well as a stalkery side, which fully emerged when the ex-fiance was done and finished with him and the relationship. Had this ex been put on the stand to testify, it's likely behavior patterns exhibited by BC from their time together would have come out in testimony and that would have corroborated behavior patterns testified to in the trial by those closest to NC, which related to the year or so before her murder. Slippery slope that. I saw some red flags in BC's behaviors when I read the affidavit and thought it very good fortune the ex-fiance got away. Probably would be deemed too prejudicial for a jury to hear, but it does add to the whole picture.