dexter75
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2015
- Messages
- 2,209
- Reaction score
- 71
BAM!!This 6/12/18 year thing is not that clear cut, at least not to me, and I know it's not to others as well. He was convicted of the assault against P.B., wrongfully, and later plead no contest and got 6 years to run concurrently. Here is the doc: http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-c...f-Conviction-1985-Endagerment-and-Firearm.pdf
But lets put it into context... or better yet, lets look at how Buting put it into context in a Memo Opposing prior bad acts: Page 13 http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-c...mo-Opposing-Uncharged-Misconduct-Evidence.pdf
Avery pled guilty or no contest to the Morris charge
- but only after his wrongful conviction for the 1985 rape and on the expectation
that he would get a concurrent sentence (which he did). His failure to contest the
Morris charge must be understood in that context. He was a man whom the system
had failed, who was bitter, who by reason of immediate personal experience quite
understandably doubted the ability of juries to spare the innocent, and who was
giving up hope. If the Court admitted the Morris incident, it also would have to
allow this evidence of context
SM also backtracked on some of the written report statements in her deposition.
[video=youtube;QbA5rPXIFr8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbA5rPXIFr8[/video]
And lets not forget her BFF Judy Dvorak, her comments IMO are largely responsible for PB misidentifying SA.
(I was unable to include the 6 minute youtube clip of her deposition, only 1 video allowed in a post... who knew? LOL)
Also, whether it's agreed on or not, SA WAS suing for 18 years of wrongful imprisonment, I have read the majority of the documents (if not all lol) and have never come across anything that Manitowoc County, Kocourek or Vogel argued that it was actually only 12 years.
This I would agree with. I think Jodi spoke about it in her interviews and they are in the CASO report.
This I am not sure I can agree with because I don't have any evidence of that. We do know that October 31st would have been the 6th time she photographed a vehicle for SA, but it was technically a Janda vehicle. We also know she did one in September for Tom Janda.
from this doc http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Offer-of-Proof.pdf
a) June 20, 2005 (Image #1)
b) August 22,2005 (Image#2)
c) August 29,2005 (Image #3)
d) September 19,2005 (Images #4 and #5)
e) October 10, 2005 (Image #6)
Taking a quick look at the documents, it looks like TJanda had an appointment for the 19th of September, but maybe she did a hustle shot for Avery that day as well. Never noticed this before now. On her sheet it said 2 photo's and another, see attached, but I don't see 'the attached'. http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-c...it-19-Halbach-Appointment-Sheet-2005Sep19.pdf
Sure.
How do we know this?
Don't forget that we only have a small window of phone records for SA, and they are cell phone records. Those records do indicate that he made numerous calls.
I'm going to stop here for now ;-)
Thank you Missy, for doing what some of us just do not have the patients to do❤😉
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk