Brooke Bennett, 12 yrs. old Randolph, VT #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
LOcked up and they cant' say he's not repeated, he just hasn't been caught is all

Also, if she really was talking to someone on the internet, whose to say it wasn't him pretending to be someone else?

I'm beginning to think that explains why Brooke was at the laundrymat. This guy could have preplanned this to the hilt and he wasn't going to be caught and go back to prison. The other victim in Randolph is lucky he didn't cause them to disappear as well.
 
10 minutes till the presser. Anyone seeing a live link:
 
You know the more I think about it, that seems a bit odd...don't you think.

BTW- to address an earlier post- DM never came out and said she was in any of the organized searches for Nick Garza, but she did say she had gone down there after the point of entry was established. It sounds as if she's just a concerned citizen.

Maybe she is a reporter... Media would possibly follow up after a point of entry was established...
 
Jacques, Mike & Denise
1850 E Bethel Rd
Randolph Center, VT 05061

removed phone number



Is this him and his wife?
 
I'm beginning to think that explains why Brooke was at the laundrymat. This guy could have preplanned this to the hilt and he wasn't going to be caught and go back to prison. The other victim in Randolph is lucky he didn't cause them to disappear as well.

They kept saying the uncle and cousin dropped her off. This could have been his plan, (alibi) he then took the cousin somewhere and went back for her which would explain the 45 minutes (or less) that she was last seen.
 
Lol littledeer, what's more shocking to me is the press didn't pick up that the uncle was an RSO. The first thing I do when I get a name is look up the RSO registry.

Isn't that the TRUTH Suzi!! I don't get it either!! Were they all sleeping on the job at the same time?? :confused:
 
You know the more I think about it, that seems a bit odd...don't you think.

BTW- to address an earlier post- DM never came out and said she was in any of the organized searches for Nick Garza, but she did say she had gone down there after the point of entry was established. It sounds as if she's just a concerned citizen.

I agree. Something doesn't seem right there
 
If there was a cousin, then IMO she must of have told LE something that didn't jive with his story??

Or maybe just the fact, that she didn't go into the store with Brooke and her (Dad?), but was told to wait in the car?? That would arouse a bit of suspicion with LE on the Uncle's story, I would think.



They kept saying the uncle and cousin dropped her off. This could have been his plan, (alibi) he then took the cousin somewhere and went back for her which would explain the 45 minutes (or less) that she was last seen.
 
Isn't that the TRUTH Suzi!! I don't get it either!! Were they all sleeping on the job at the same time?? :confused:

I swear that reporters these days are so afraid of getting into trouble that they don't go after the big scoop.
 
At the fox video I linked above, if I heard correctly the panel states that MJ was locked away from 1993-2006. So if that's true, why was he on unsupervised RSO status? No wonder his record is clean from 1993. He was locked up most of this time!

I don't know how he could have been locked away all that time. The child he is jail for right now for assaulting, says it has gone on for five years, starting when she was 9 and ending just a few weeks ago. So, he has atleast been out since 2003. :confused:
 
2 minutes to 4 here. Is anyone going to be able to let us know what is going on with the presser?????????????????
 
http://www.wcax.com/global/story.asp?s=8576795

(snip)
Police say they uncovered evidence linking Michael Jacques, 42, to a child sex ring while investigating Brooke's disappearance. But they say the charges are unrelated to Brooke's case.
Jacques is accused of sexually assaulting a young girl over several years. He was charged with aggravated sexual assault of a minor.
 
They kept saying the uncle and cousin dropped her off. This could have been his plan, (alibi) he then took the cousin somewhere and went back for her which would explain the 45 minutes (or less) that she was last seen.
Let's also remember, we still don't know what transpired the night before...there's more time unaccounted for. I wonder who was home at the uncle's the night before with Brooke. Something very strange about that.
 
has Brook's mother been interviewed on TV or come out to say anything ? I just wondered, everything seems to be filtering thru the dad, which is OK. Just curious if anybody has heard anything from her.
 
http://www.wcax.com/global/story.asp?s=8576795

(snip)
Police say they uncovered evidence linking Michael Jacques, 42, to a child sex ring while investigating Brooke's disappearance. But they say the charges are unrelated to Brooke's case.
Jacques is accused of sexually assaulting a young girl over several years. He was charged with aggravated sexual assault of a minor.
A child sex ring? You've got to be kidding me!! What did DM say about this area...idyllic for kids?!
 
I don't know how he could have been locked away all that time. The child he is jail for right now for assaulting, says it has gone on for five years, starting when she was 9 and ending just a few weeks ago. So, he has atleast been out since 2003. :confused:


actually, it states he was done with "state supervision in 2006" that could mean he got out of jail in 03 but had 3 years of probation. IMO
 
This makes me so sick to my stomach. With the term child sex ring it makes me wonder how many more victims there are.

http://www.wcax.com/global/story.asp?s=8576795

(snip)
Police say they uncovered evidence linking Michael Jacques, 42, to a child sex ring while investigating Brooke's disappearance. But they say the charges are unrelated to Brooke's case.
Jacques is accused of sexually assaulting a young girl over several years. He was charged with aggravated sexual assault of a minor.
 
I'm wondering since the Uncle was involved with a "child sex ring" that maybe he had set up Brooke with one of his other cohorts that were involved?

Maybe he didn't have anything to do with Brooke's disappearance directly. But found out later that this cohort did do something with Brooke and so they both came up with this story about Brooke meeting up with a friend (which would be true in a way or actually is the truth if this cohort was the one corresponding with her on Myspace).

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
182
Total visitors
287

Forum statistics

Threads
609,167
Messages
18,250,375
Members
234,549
Latest member
raymehay
Back
Top