Dad sounds like the narcissist some of us thought he must be. I was surprised to be moved by mom’s statement. I think she was perhaps depressed and overwhelmed. But she knows and acknowledged that she hurt the children. Good for her!The hearing for anyone who missed it:
I am very worried about the amount that Jane Doe #5 minimized the abuse. It just is not possible that they were given as much food as they needed and were all severely malnourished. So her statement doesn’t seem particularly rooted in reality. I hope all the kids continue to receive therapy so they can process what they’ve been through.Wow Joy's statement was something else. I wonder if her siblings agree with her. She seemed awfully forgiving. I wonder if she didn't get abused as much as the others or was a favorite.
I just don't understand how they did what they did, it seems they truly love each other and the kids. The ultra religious stuff is nuts. Also, that David seems like the patriarch controlling kind, all of this is his fault IMO. He groomed Louise to do what she did. Anyway. I'm glad it's over. What I wouldn't give to read those diaries!
Fair enough. :wink:According to some statements she was the ringleader. No way am I going to accept that she was some poor, abused woman being forced to abuse and torture her kids by her husband. I recognize her type. She seems like a total borderline to me.
They are equally responsible.
I have such mixed feelings about her, although I will officially defer to @gitana1. But I did see her trying to smile at her oldest son as he was speaking. I think at least some of what she said and felt was real.I didn't see the flirting with her attorney. But the tears at least seemed real. She was probably crying for herself. More than likely.
I think she was perhaps depressed and overwhelmed. But she knows and acknowledged that she hurt the children. Good for her!
This one, quoted by Brian Rokos, is curious too:
One of the female victims said “I saw my dad change my mom. They almost changed me.”
Sibling #1 - Jenn.; born in 1988; female.
Sibling #2 - Josh.; born in 1992; male.
Sibling #3 - Jess.; born in 1993; female.
Sibling #4 - Jon.; born in 1995; male.
Sibling #5 - Jo.; born in 1997; female.
Sibling #6 - Juli.; born in 1998; female.
Sibling #7 - Jea.; born in 1999; female.
Sibling #8 - Jor.; born in 2000; female.
Sibling #9 - Jam.; born in 2002; male.
Sibling #10 - Joan.; born in 2003; female.
Sibling #11 - Jol.; born in 2004; female.
Sibling #12 - Jul.; born in 2005; female.
Sibling #13 - Jan.; born in 2015; female.
The children who spoke seemed so forgiving of their parents. I wonder if they feel some sort of reversed guilt.... I appreciate their kindness and willingness to forgive and I do believe their wishes should be respected. With that being said... almost Stockholm syndrome ish.
I wish them all the world has to offer. I am not particularly religious, but in their case I am grateful they have God to be a father to them. Seems to give them a truly beautiful strength.
Again... is the gravity of the parents being locked up somehow minimizing the legitimacy of their experience - because what they went through is actual torture.
She was having some trouble getting pregnant for a while, she was even going to a fertility clinic and then she had the youngest baby.Does anyone else find peculiar the 10-year gap between sibs 12 and 13? (Given how frequent and regular were the intervals between the other births?
Very nice article about the comfort K-9.If you scroll down, awhile ago he said this:
"Raider, the @CoronaPD comfort dog, just entered the courtroom. Raider goes to court hearings to comfort witnesses and victims. This all but confirms an appearance by some of the Turpin children."
I remember our mother sitting in her recliner and crying, saying she don’t know what to do. She didn’t want to use rope or chain, but she was afraid her children were taking in too much sugar and caffeine.”
Did you take that to mean brainwashing or some variation thereof?
Emotional abuse is a form of psychological abuse that includes isolation. These children have suffered enormously at the hands of their “parents” and it is far too early to know the long term effects and how it will impact their lives.
Sadly, this was the only life these children knew. While it's horrendous and beyond our comprehension how they were abused and mistreated, they had endured it all their lives and it was the norm for them. This is why I believe some of them have minimized and/or justified all that has happened.
The following is from an interesting article on the subject.
Psychological abuse is even harder on kids than we thought
"It was only when researchers looked at kids who had endured both physical and sexual abuse that they saw similar odds of behavioral problems and psychological disorders as seen in the kids who’d been psychologically abused. (Psychological abuse can take myriad forms, but a few common forms are acts by caregivers that belittle, demean, bully, withhold affection from, exploit or isolate a child.)"
So far it seems that the children are making good progress, but I found a few of the statements quite worrying.
Did you take that to mean brainwashing or some variation thereof?
Does anyone else find peculiar the 10-year gap between sibs 12 and 13? (Given how frequent and regular were the intervals between the other births?