...
Re several previous posts, it's within the realm of possibility that there will be more charges but currently her only felony charge is Accessory After the Fact Penal Code 32. It isn't debatable if it includes before or during (it does not).
Law section
It may not feel like it's too early to decide on charges at this point, BUT, I do feel like LE needs to have some more details about the story these two might decide to tell. If she stands by a story that she did not know he had a gun, yet ballistics show that he used a long gun/rifle of some sort - or some sort if weapon that could not have possibly been hidden from her view/ awareness, (or perhaps even the driver's favorite weapon which he likely wouldn't have possessed without her knowledge), then there's a very likely chance that her story could be "dismantled" in court & the prosecution could likely make some sort of charges stick on her. Alternatively, there are probably several scenarios that would support the river as having some level of 'innocence' on the whole event. I feel like there are an *endless* array of possibilities as to what claims these two may make and as to what evidence LE has definitively secured. As much as I hate it, I think we may just need to let this play out and try to keep an open mind.I agree. Charge them with what they know they can get. They can still go back and try for more later. My guess is that they are still looking to add charges to the driver, but I’d be surprised if any further charges are brought.
I did not see anything saying she said that she didn't know about the gun. Can you please give me a link, so I can read. Thanks.It may not feel like it's too early to decide on charges at this point, BUT, I do feel like LE needs to have some more details about the story these two might decide to tell. If she stands by a story that she did not know he had a gun, yet ballistics show that he used a long gun/rifle of some sort - or some sort if weapon that could not have possibly been hidden from her view/ awareness, (or perhaps even the driver's favorite weapon which he likely wouldn't have possessed without her knowledge), then there's a very likely chance that her story could be "dismantled" in court & the prosecution could likely make some sort of charges stick on her. Alternatively, there are probably several scenarios that would support the river as having some level of 'innocence' on the whole event. I feel like there are an *endless* array of possibilities as to what claims these two may make and as to what evidence LE has definitively secured. As much as I hate it, I think we may just need to let this play out and try to keep an open mind.
She doesn't look afraid in mugshot. MOO
Or dumbfounded...Nope. Just perturbed that she got caught.
Iirc, the $500,000 (?) reward was raised thru private individuals or entities (like, g*-fund-m* or equivalent), so the $ is controlled by campaign sponsor/organizer. IOW LE does not control this reward money.
What is that?I would not be surprised if Marcus Anthony Eriz turns out to be an injustice collector.
What is that?
Sounds like things were only going to get worse with this guy. I'm glad he's off the streets.
Thanks for the info! When I google search the case all I get are week old stories and nothing as in depth as this.JUN 16, 2021
Details Emerge From Prosecutors on Killing of 6-Year-Old Aiden Leos on Freeway in OC – NBC Los Angeles
[...]
During the week of May 24-28, the two got into another "altercation on the freeway," prosecutors said.
"As Wynne Lee was driving on the 91 eastbound on the way to work with defendant Eriz as her front passenger, a driver in a blue Tesla did something to make defendant Eriz angry, acting aggressively," prosecutors alleged.
"Defendant Eriz again took out his gun and brandished it to the driver of the Tesla. That driver told the defendants that he had called the police and then he drove away."
[...]
The couple also applied for a new job after May 28, prosecutors said.
Prosecutors argue that Eriz is an "extreme danger to the community" who has "shown that he cannot control his temper and he goes to extremes in the snap of a finger when he is angered."
Eriz has "multiple firearms in his possession," including an "AR, a revolver and the Glock 17 that was used in this murder," prosecutors argued.
[...]
Both defendants were originally being held on $1 million bail, but Yellin tentatively increased Eriz's bail to $2 million, and dropped Lee's bail to $500,000.
Those bail amounts, which were requested by prosecutors, will remain in place until Friday's arraignment, when attorneys will present their arguments to keep the bails at $2 million and $500,000.
Bail could potentially be reduced further for Lee, who was originally booked on suspicion of murder but was only charged with being an accessory, Yellin said.
I agree. Then another incident in which she is driving, knows he has the gun, knows he killed a child. Prosecutors may request her bail be raised tomorrow in court, MOO.But she knew he had aimed a loaded gun at the original vehicle and intentionally fired it. Then she fled the scene with him without regard for the outcome.
Then she was also driving when another gun-brandishing episode on the freeway occurred.
She is aiding and abetting this killer.
She needs to go to prison to think about her life and the lost life of Aiden Leos.
She is trash