CharlestonGal
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- 47,452
Yes.Do you think someone knows for sure if she is deceased?
Yes.Do you think someone knows for sure if she is deceased?
The missing nursing student that Carrie McGonigle and her dog found was Michelle Le; I may have mentioned her case upthread.
I wasn't aware that she had a search and rescue group!
Fabulous idea to contact her, IMHO.
ETA: The reasons that I was thinking of Michelle's case are 1) that she was found in Sunol Canyon (East SF Bay Area), which is also not an easy place to search, and 2) I remember that her friends, family members, and volunteers came up from Southern CA every weekend to search - for months. They would not give up. And their efforts paid off.
In a case of kidnapping with ransom demands I would expect a complete news blackout while the police were investigating. Interference by the public could put the victim at risk.If LE thinks there's a credible report of a kidnapper (phone calls, etc), then this is an amazing and almost unprecedented example of withholding information. Somewhere, a woman is being held by ??? and we are not to be thinking to be on the look-out for her?
If negotiations with the kidnappers are still ongoing (after more than a month) and LE hasn't located the kidnapper, that too is unprecedented and very scary. Let's say she's in Mexico. That could slow things down for sure. "Locating" means "finding the general area" where the phone call is coming from. Or mail.
But you're right - we have no idea.
Do you think someone knows for sure if she is deceased?
Yes.
In a case of kidnapping with ransom demands I would expect a complete news blackout while the police were investigating. Interference by the public could put the victim at risk.
I think it's highly unlikely that this is what's happened here, but I'm not ruling it out.
I believe she was by the rocks because she was walking with RT and he said he stopped but she kept going, pulled ahead. Yea, she got lost and if she ended up at the highway she very well, out of thirst and heat, could have flagged a car down.
That would make sense. But I also think kidnapping for ransom is unlikely mainly because they did intense searches for 9 days. I don’t believe LE would waste time and resources if they knew she was elsewhere. And I also don’t believe kidnappers would wait 9 days to demand ransom.In a case of kidnapping with ransom demands I would expect a complete news blackout while the police were investigating. Interference by the public could put the victim at risk.
I think it's highly unlikely that this is what's happened here, but I'm not ruling it out.
Your post reminded me that Carrie McGonigle, Amber Dubois' mother, created a search/rescue team after Amber was abducted and murdered. She has a (or more) SAR-trained dogs and they have helped recover some missing people. She could be a great help to Ms. Thomas' family and friends, and I believe she would be happy to share her contacts and experience. They might even search for Ms. Thomas, if her family asks. She lives in Escondido, just north of San Diego. Close enough, IMO, to ask!
Remembering Amber Dubois and Chelsea King a decade later
>>>snip
Since 2010, Amber’s mother Carrie McGonigle has honored her daughter by participating in searches for missing children and adults using search-and-rescue dogs. In 2011, Carrie and her dog located the remains of a local nursing student in Northern California. Carrie said her daughter would have said, “you go, mom!”
<<<snip
The link to her Facebook page (Team Amber Rescue) :
Team Amber Rescue
I don't have Facebook, but I was able to read the page, where I found this PDF:
Managing Social Media When A Loved One Is Missing
Managing Social Media Sites When A Loved One Is Missing.pdf
But didn’t LE definitively state “no foul play”? RT seems to think she was taken.I do believe there is a strong possibilty that someone she thought was benign may have picked Barbara up, and didn't have good intentions when doing so. She would only know this once trapped inside of the vehicle when it was too late.
We have also seen victims abducted with a female inside of the vehicle along with a male. We are seeing more cases involving male, and female tag teams. I suppose they do this because they know another female wont feel as apprehensive, and will be more trusting if they see another female in the vehicle. Male, female violent offenders have become so plentiful now that ID has a seperate series of just those cases. Many do involve sex predators where the female is used to lure the victims. The females also partake in the sexual abuse, and even in the murders of the victims.
It bothers me from what I've have read over the years about predators is they often cruise these kind of areas looking for targets who are vulnerable, and alone.
Barbara seem to be a free spirit even at her age. She may have been too trusting by always seeing the best in everyone.
We have seen cases where the victim either got in the vehicle willingly or was pulled into the vehicle quickly in the blink of an eye. In most of those cases no one saw or heard anything at all when it hapoened. Not one thing for it only takes seconds to do.
Jmho
According to this MSM article, they ruled out her being kidnapped or abducted:But didn’t LE definitively state “no foul play”? RT seems to think she was taken.
Amateur opinion and speculation
Unless it happened further down the road, after (as speculated) she took the wrong trail and rejoined the road elsewhere.Unless RT is hard of hearing (possible), he would have heard a car stop and a car door open and close, IMO. Perhaps he did and perhaps the police are discounting that detail.
......................
In that case, I think she had already crossed the road and was unable to get into the RV. Makes no sense for her to leave her husband cordially and then hop in a car that happened to stop while she was trying to cross the road. She had every reason to believe she'd be in the RV within 30-40 seconds at that point.
So "We don't think she was abducted." Means LE has ruled out an abduction?According to this MSM article, they ruled out her being kidnapped or abducted:
"California police rule out husband's claims that his bikini-clad wife, 69, who disappeared during their hike was KIDNAPPED as search for her enters its tenth day:
'We don't think she was abducted. It's a very remote area. There's no evidence to suggest she was abducted,' spokeswoman Jodi Miller told DailyMail.com.
...
California police say missing hiker who vanished 'in her bikini' was NOT abducted | Daily Mail Online
I think they need a warrant for a tower dump and to get a warrant, they need evidence of a crime. LE has stated no indication of foul play. Typically, LE can get warrants for the missing individual's phone after a week or so, but for others, I think the bar is higher. Just my guess, though.Unless RT is hard of hearing (possible), he would have heard a car stop and a car door open and close, IMO. Perhaps he did and perhaps the police are discounting that detail. It would have had to be two people, because no driver could pull an adult into a car via the driver's door, they'd have to get out, subdue her, etc. More likely that the person tried to appear helpful and Barb was so desperate that instead of walking back to her husband for water, she got in the car.
In that case, I think she had already crossed the road and was unable to get into the RV. Makes no sense for her to leave her husband cordially and then hop in a car that happened to stop while she was trying to cross the road. She had every reason to believe she'd be in the RV within 30-40 seconds at that point.
Maybe the Bad Guys offered her a seat in the car with A/C to wait for RT and then took off with her (that's the only thing that would make sense to me). The chances of it are vanishingly small, but this is a very strange case. That would make Barbara one of the most unlucky people I've ever heard of.
Obviously, LE doesn't think that happened. I wish we had one of the techie people here on this thread to help us understand cell phone pings and GPS tracking. There's cell service at that spot, so surely they checked the tower(s) to see who was out there (and if they had criminal history). Can they tell from pings if the car stopped? If it was only for 1-2 minutes? I have no clue.
To me it means they do not think she was abducted and aren’t investigating it as such. I’m sure nothing can be ruled out 100% until she is found, but I think it’s as close as you can get to ruling it out at the moment.So "We don't think she was abducted." Means LE has ruled out an abduction?
This was in response to RT's earlier assumption that she'd been kidnapped...
Since he's already hired an atty., and that atty. is "frantically" trying to find Barbara-- what is the progress in this case ? What has his atty. been doing ?....
Maybe hire a P.I. to find her ? Unsure if that would constitute "legal action"....
I think it means they don't know for sure she was abducted.To me it means they do not think she was abducted and aren’t investigating it as such. I’m sure nothing can be ruled out 100% until she is found, but I think it’s as close as you can get to ruling it out at the moment.