As I’ve said before, I think Bryce made up his mind and all the stalling was purposeful whether for contemplation or as a means of distracting his parents. My opinions and theories have definitely evolved and became more simple the longer I follow missing person cases. While I do believe it’s not always what it seems, I tend to stick with the most logical explanation is probably true. (Only sometimes it seems there is no most logical explanation.) It’s like trust your gut to me. My instincts may not be 100% but if I listen to my gut feelings, the worst that happens is I was overly cautious for no reason.
I hope they do search the area more thoroughly. Even if he were found there, it’s possible that some may not find closure if they cannot accept certain explanations. But that is their right and no one can make another come to terms with something they don’t want to. No one can convince someone of something they don’t believe or don’t want to believe. Sometimes acceptance is never found and that’s just the way it is. The pain of losing a loved one is very personal and I think sometimes our mind gets stuck on certain things as a means of protection. Just like how a traumatic event is removed from our memory when needed.
Yeah after thinking about this on and off for 7 years now the information has bounced around my head enough that most of the the extraneous stuff has been loosened up and shaken off. I think you are right about the acceptance thing -- Bryce's is the first missing person case I followed and after researching and learning about so many more -- in that there seems to be a mental roadblock for families in many cases.
I think reserving judgement about it from a human standpoint is the right thing to do. At the same time, in a case where someone is missing, my personal opinion has changed to who cares about whatever the bad or embarrassing stuff is let's just get them back if possible.