Jane Doe on left, Amber Lace Akerley on right
I too originally had Amber on my preliminary list.
I took her off my list for 3 reasons:
1. Amber is listed as 2" taller (this is a minor discrepancy to me)
2. Amber had a pierced tongue and a scar on her head. Jane Doe had no scars that they could find and no pierced tongue was mentioned. Unfortunately we don't know how far along the decomposition was - perhaps these two identifiers were not possible to see?
3. There is mention of Amber's pierced tongue in her description, but no mention of pierced ears. Amber's photo does not show earrings. Jane Doe had pierced ears.
3. Amber Disappeared on April 10th, Jane Doe's death was estimated at Mid April-which means, if this was Amber she'd have to travel from Minnesota and meet her demise when she arrived in California. Its possible, but it just seems to be a very tight timeline.
babydust2004 please note that the above is just what I thought - I could be very wrong!
Additional comments:
Also, if her killer was travelling with her, why dump her body in a populated area where there is someone to see you do it? Why not go into an isolated area - which is not too hard to find. Of course, it is possible that Jane Doe was just passing through and met someone from that area.
If the note is real I think "Jim" lives in the area (even a few towns over) - even though Jane Doe might not have. Perhaps the person who left the note does not know Jane's identity, but does know who killed her? The garbage bag, in a restaurant dumpster, in a closed restaurant's parking lot says "I know this place" to me... but that's me.