legalmomma
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2014
- Messages
- 1,817
- Reaction score
- 17,696
And the appeal, on and on. This is a definite "Money Train". Must continue to put forth a vigorous and expensive defense. EH definitely landed right side up.I'd say let's squeeze as many billable hours as possible before sentencing!
We have a separate thread for Balwani.We have not really discussed Balwani's case, he was convicted on 12 charges of fraud, as opposed to Holmes four charges. Balwani did not testify in his own defense, he was also convicted of charges related to patient fraud as well.
I guess that EH, blaming Balwani for everything almost worked.
Theranos ex-COO Sunny Balwani found guilty on all 12 fraud charges 6 months after founder Holmes' conviction
The jury in the fraud trial of former Theranos executive Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani reached a verdict on Thursday.www.cnbc.com
Yes. But it is interesting to compare the convictions. Why do you think EH was convicted of four counts, to Balwani getting 12 counts? Plus the patient fraud counts.We have a separate thread for Balwani.
Because he has his own thread here.We have not really discussed Balwani's case, he was convicted on 12 charges of fraud, as opposed to Holmes four charges. Balwani did not testify in his own defense, he was also convicted of charges related to patient fraud as well.
I guess that EH, blaming Balwani for everything almost worked.
Theranos ex-COO Sunny Balwani found guilty on all 12 fraud charges 6 months after founder Holmes' conviction
The jury in the fraud trial of former Theranos executive Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani reached a verdict on Thursday.www.cnbc.com
I think it's because she employed her feminine wiles.Yes. But it is interesting to compare the convictions. Why do you think EH was convicted of four counts, to Balwani getting 12 counts? Plus the patient fraud counts.
More important is what the jurors that saw all the relevant evidence and heard witness testimony thought! Seems the verdict on each charge came down to the credibility of the witnesses and what they believed about EH's intent.Yes. But it is interesting to compare the convictions. Why do you think EH was convicted of four counts, to Balwani getting 12 counts? Plus the patient fraud counts.
Theranos Inc. founder Elizabeth Holmes asked for a new trial, claiming a key witness in her criminal case visited her after the verdict and expressed misgivings about his testimony.
Holmes said in a Tuesday court filing that Adam Rosendorff, a former Theranos lab director, showed up at her home on Aug. 8 and explained to her partner that his testimony last fall had been twisted by prosecutors.
Elizabeth Holmes Claims Witness Remorse in New Trial Request
Theranos Inc. founder Elizabeth Holmes asked for a new trial, claiming a key witness in her criminal case visited her after the verdict and expressed misgivings about his testimony.www.bloomberg.com
Elizabeth is asking for a new trial. Sigh.
It worked for Scott Peterson, but fortunately not for Ghislane Maxwell.Of course. Waiting for a juror to be disqualified for some reason next.
There is an entire playbook on the strategy, done by DUI conviction John Goodman, Polo Club owner/player, heir...he has had millions to spend on his defense...he is incarcerated, but he delayed it for years. And he is still working on new strategies for appeals, dismissal, reduction of sentence...on and on...
Well, now we know the new information.
I agree. It's kind of ridiculous that now he has second thoughts about his testimony, therefore she's not guilty. Smacks of desperation to me. Sentence her already!Well, now we know the new information.
Elizabeth Holmes Claims Witness Remorse in New Trial Request
Theranos Inc. founder Elizabeth Holmes asked for a new trial, claiming a key witness in her criminal case visited her after the verdict and expressed misgivings about his testimony.www.bloomberg.com
9/6/22
The misgivings that Rosendorff voiced, absent any statement that he lied or didn’t testify accurately, probably won’t convince the judge that Holmes deserves a new trial, according to Michael Weinstein, a criminal defense attorney not involved in the case.
“A witness having second thoughts and how they were generally perceived is not new in criminal trials but often don’t lead to new trials or much of anything,” Weinstein said in an email. “The burden for that is simply too high.”
Holmes, 38, was found guilty of defrauding investors and conspiracy for her role in the collapse of the blood-testing startup she founded that reached a peak valuation of $9 billion. Her ex-boyfriend and former Theranos President Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani was convicted in July of similar counts, as well as defrauding patients.
US District Judge Edward Davila on Tuesday issued an order rejecting Holmes’s long-shot attempt to get her fraud conviction thrown out, saying there was “sufficient evidence” for the jury to reach its verdict. Holmes’s bid for a new trial is another gamble that almost all white-collar criminal convicts make, and rarely win.