That shouldn't be allowed. Weapons could be smuggled in, and I've seen the ability to order Chicago pizza from Chicago all over the country from a company called Goldbelly.
What I found interesting was that near the beginning of the video three female inmates were taken into the facility in hand cuffs. No cuffs for EH.
I think the handcuffed ones were transfers or returning to the prison from court appearances etc. EH reported from 'home' (not an incarcerated situation) ergo no handcuffs.What I found interesting was that near the beginning of the video three female inmates were taken into the facility in hand cuffs. No cuffs for EH.
Then, we would have had a Tex-Mex-knock-off. She’s from Texas, too. But it would have looked very parodic. Psychopaths imitate what they don’t have themselves that they think they’re supposed to have, e.g. feelings, so the effect of the whole package is ludicrous. The Behavior Panel talks about this all the time, but an early episode is especially show-and-tell.Okay - you had me laughing at this! But oh so true! LOL!
I too thought she would head for the Mexican border.
Right. Narcs don’t get ego fuel from other Narcs. They get off on devaluing, messing with an empath or a naive person IMO.
Yes, this is why we need GM to move in with EH: she'd totally mess with her head. EH has nowhere to go if that happens. At Stanford, she could just leave if someone challenged her brains, and she could say she was too brilliant to stick around. Sooner or later in that prison, she's gonna come into contact with inmates who are much more clever than she is. Successful white-collared women, successful blue-collared women, and women who have prodigious street savvy. EH has been counting on her looks and men: she'll have neither. And she couldn't hack Stanford, so I think she has a lotta weak spots.
Yes, EH was surrendering per the terms of the Court.
Yes being involved in a Chinese language immersion program in China isn't exceptional for Stanford, it's expected.
I'll bet those jobs are competitive, and with the likely many other inmates with much more impressive education credentials (e.g. college degrees), it may be hard to get an official teaching job.
This will have to do for now.. courtesy of Former Theranos Exec Ramesh 'Sunny' Balwani Convicted Of Collaborating With Elizabeth Holmes In Massive Fraud | Oxygen Official SiteWhere’s her mugshot ?
ETA: just read they don’t release photos
or really any info regarding arrival or departure of prisoners.
How “special “ for EH.
View attachment 425669FPC Bryan
www.bop.gov
Yeah, they blew it. Maybe they thought that she'd successfully delay going to prison. No one bought "Liz's" shtick.Part of the conceit of Chozick’s story was being swept up by this version of Holmes, just as Theranos board members and investors had been by another persona. But multiple Times journalists I spoke to felt that such asides and caveats were not enough to salvage the article or justify its framing. As one put it: “Why tell readers that a New York Times editor thought a reporter was too credulous, and then use the story to prove it?” Or as another put it: “You have to ask, on our side, what the hell happened here?”
Holmes, I’m told, got help from Risa Heller, the crisis communications maven, in brokering the Times piece, according to multiple sources. (Heller did not respond to multiple requests for comment.)
The consternation over the Holmes profile and dispute over Carreyrou’s delayed announcement highlights the specific tension of business journalism, between getting access to CEOs and founders while also doing critical investigative work. “It’s disappointing, because it undercuts Erin, and obviously Carreyrou did a lot of really great reporting on all of this stuff,” said one Times reporter. “And then we serve up a thing like that, and The New York Times becomes known as a softball place for criminal millionaires to land their puff pieces. It sucks to see.”
The New York Times’ Elizabeth Holmes Profile Is Causing Drama in the Newsroom: “What the Hell Happened Here?”
As Holmes headed to jail Tuesday, business editor Ellen Pollock was put on the spot to defend a soft-focus profile of the disgraced Theranos founder, telling staff she didn’t “give a ” about the criticism.www.vanityfair.com
She’s never been employed by anyone, so, yeah, no employer recommendations.
