GUILTY CA - Erin Corwin, 19, pregnant, Twentynine Palms, 28 June 2014 - #3

[Memewhitehurst]

Big investigation, many Detectives? Who knows? I'm personally satisfied with the witness' truthfulness, and am grateful he spoke to CBS8.

who is Beasley?

 

[Knox]

who is Beasley?

http://www.cbs8.com/story/26028006/...arine-wife-had-rendezvous-with-man-in-red-car

 

[rosesfromangels]

Prayers continue to bring this young woman home, and for the all the wonderful people out there searching for her. God Bless and guide them!

 

[RSC]

Ah, yes. Then #2 fits red car stats, plus geographical connection to other publicly released information related to warrants. #1 does not.

This is the #1 and #2 theory

 

[klily444]

This is the #1 and #2 theory

But, if 2 hypothetically "works" with the victim, wouldn't that be considered a proven connection?

 

[cluciano63]

There is a photo of Erin wearing glasses on the FB page.

 

[Cami2]

On HLN now. Jane V Mitchell show

 

[beachlvr0810]

Interviewing witness

 

[LinasK]

JVM talking to Michael Beasley. Witness. Saw her getting out of vehicle. Wearing a blue baseball cap and sunglasses. It was her car. She got out of the blue car and got into a red car.( small compact- Hyundai?) Guy had short hair, shorter than 5'9" .No struggle involved, they drove off.
He's also saying her car has been moved from where he first spotted it.

 

[Knox]

#Exclusive interview with witness in missing #ErinCorwin case... on @HLNTV right now!
Expand

 

[m_brown]

not "proven" yet, in the sense that the "working" relationship has not been addressed by MSM. (meaning we can't really address it)

I believe the similar interest shared between EC and #2 was addressed only in comments on an article (if I remember correctly!)

But, if 2 hypothetically "works" with the victim, wouldn't that be considered a proven connection?

 

[la2cabo]

I emailed CBS8, regarding the conflicting statements on whether or not LE spoke to Beasley on June 30th. I received the reply below.

Now that is some great sleuthing!!! :happydance:

 

[beachlvr0810]

Witness says her car was left literally 5 minutes away from the base gate

 

[Plumeria5]

JVM talking to Michael Beasley. Witness. Saw her getting out of vehicle. Wearing a blue baseball cap and sunglasses. It was her car. She got out of the blue car and got into a red car.( small compact- Hyundai?) Guy had short red hair, shorter than 5'9" .No struggle involved, they drove off.

He had red hair?

Witness says he would talk a polygraph.

 

[scorekeeper]

Ah, yes. Then #2 fits red car stats, plus geographical connection to other publicly released information related to warrants. #1 does not.

so are u saying that #1 and #2 may both possibly be involved in Erin's disappearance?

:banghead:

 

[Xara]

#Exclusive interview with witness in missing #ErinCorwin case... on @HLNTV right now!
Expand

I'm having a hard time understanding what he is saying. The audio sucks.

 

[CluelessWonder]

This is the #1 and #2 theory

Thanks. I must be stupid. I can't make any sense of it. Here's my translation. Tell me what I'm missing:

Someone knows Erin, and nobody knows what that someone was up to on the day she disappeared.
Someone else doesn't know Erin but was in the same area as her when she disappeared.
The second person and the first person do not share some attribute. Law enforcement is looking for someone who has the second person's attribute. But the second person is not connected to Erin.

Both people are responsible for her disappearance. One of them knows something about the other that was supposed to be a secret.

Is that accurate? If so, is it being suggested that two people killed Erin? If so, why?

 

[scorekeeper]

Thanks. I must be stupid. I can't make any sense of it. Here's my translation. Tell me what I'm missing:

Someone knows Erin but we don't know Erin, and nobody knows what that someone was up to on the day she disappeared.
Someone else doesn't know Erin but was in the same area as her when she disappeared.
The second person and the first person do not share some attribute. Law enforcement is looking for someone who has the second person's attribute. But the second person is not connected to Erin.

Both people are responsible for her disappearance. One of them knows something about the other that was supposed to be a secret.

Is that accurate? If so, is it being suggested that two people killed Erin? If so, why?

Yea, what CW said!!

 

[rizzo0904]

I think attribute equals spouse

 

[la2cabo]

This is the #1 and #2 theory

Call me dense, stupid or dumb blonde but this still makes no sense to me. And throwing in the banana's and the Muppets only made it worse. :whoosh:ullhair: