People here have mentioned LR getting a protective order against Angela, but let's not forget this one, where Angela is the
plaintiff and LR is the
defendant:
http://casesearch.courts.state.md.u...seId=1001SP004072005&loc=36&detailLoc=DSCIVIL
This one contains the specific language ordering LR to "stay away from schools," which has always bothered me, making me wonder if abuse or threats towards a minor (her child?) was involved.
I could be looking at this incident wrong, but I have read this as Angela getting a protective order against LR on behalf of her and a child. In many cases where the evidence is not "strong" enough for protective orders, judges will grant them and simply make them mutual (a sort of "no-fault" judgment that grants protection without assigning one party to blame). These are sometimes common in divorce cases as well.
I just wanted to make sure that when referencing this incident, we don't
only see LR as the victim, since the courts didn't appear to.