cobalt sky
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2011
- Messages
- 816
- Reaction score
- 3,396
None of this happened because it was an answer to you posing the question what if this had happened?
So I don't see how that theoretical situation leads you to the conclusion they met, without seeing any evidence they did.
More to the point, if they did meet after Joey called the bank twice and checked the custom account, then it makes no sense that he called Chase when he arrived in Rancho to agree where to eat, and again 10 minutes later at the time Chase says they met, while Joey's phone moved from the tower near Chase's residence to the tower near CFA but Chase's phone didn't move, and called him again as he was leaving from a 2 hour lunch, and when he got home, when Chase's phone would suddenly go dark, and not answer any calls for the next almost 4 hours.
JMO
I agree that there is no solid proof (as in video footage, eye witnesses, etc.) of where either Joey or Chase were and what they were doing that afternoon. All we know is what Patrick stated that Joey said to him early in the day on the 4th, that he was meeting Chase in RC for lunch. And to cash a check, which we also afaik have no evidence either existed or was cashed. We also have phone movements based on the towers, which I believe from testimony have been proven to be somewhat unreliable. Regardless, I think based on the phone movement we can safely assume that Joey did travel to RC that day. IMO they did meet, somewhere. Maybe for lunch, maybe for some other reason/s. Your opinion is that they did not meet up, and that's fine. Right now there is no proof that I'm aware of either way. Maybe we will learn something new when the trial continues.