oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,718
The defense's unsupported theory that Joey was teaching CM how to write himself checks out of Joey's own QB account just doesnt pass the test of reasonableness. The jury is very aware of this defendant's past history.
And I certainly believe most jurors are very reasonable minded people who are able to cut through all of the fluff filler to get to the heart of the matter.
Didnt CM also use QB in his own shoddy business?
I do think the jury will decide who they think most likely stole the missing computer.
The state doesn't have to name anyone as the thief. The jury will be able to infer who that individual is based on all of the other evidence entered. They will decide who had the most opportunity to remove it at the time they all disappeared from their home. It sure wasn't DK. Yes, I 100 percent believe DK was in Hawaii. I've seen no evidence showing otherwise.
As far as the IP address nothing was proven either way except inconsistencies. Not one thing. Anytime the information isnt consistent or flawed it becomes garbage in, garbage out for jurors. Imo
They will not consider any evidence that is not verified or consistent one way or the other. The McStay IP showed it cant be relied upon. Imo.
Imo the state was able to prove the witness' own biases, and proved it quite well imo.
Imo, so another defense witness turned out better for the state than for the defense. It's obvious he is a very high priced, and way overpaid, imo, who only testifies for the defense. I can certainly see why that is the case.
The assumption without any supporting evidence that DK did this is falling faster than flies, imo.
Imo the state is letting them put all of this out there, like iffy IP addresses, which really shows nothing more than they can be inconsistent. Etc.
Hawaii is filled with people who constantly love taking photos of what they are doing while there. Also plenty of CCTV all around Hawaii.
So I say, stay tuned. The best is yet to come.
Imo
And I certainly believe most jurors are very reasonable minded people who are able to cut through all of the fluff filler to get to the heart of the matter.
Didnt CM also use QB in his own shoddy business?
I do think the jury will decide who they think most likely stole the missing computer.
The state doesn't have to name anyone as the thief. The jury will be able to infer who that individual is based on all of the other evidence entered. They will decide who had the most opportunity to remove it at the time they all disappeared from their home. It sure wasn't DK. Yes, I 100 percent believe DK was in Hawaii. I've seen no evidence showing otherwise.
As far as the IP address nothing was proven either way except inconsistencies. Not one thing. Anytime the information isnt consistent or flawed it becomes garbage in, garbage out for jurors. Imo
They will not consider any evidence that is not verified or consistent one way or the other. The McStay IP showed it cant be relied upon. Imo.
Imo the state was able to prove the witness' own biases, and proved it quite well imo.
Imo, so another defense witness turned out better for the state than for the defense. It's obvious he is a very high priced, and way overpaid, imo, who only testifies for the defense. I can certainly see why that is the case.
The assumption without any supporting evidence that DK did this is falling faster than flies, imo.
Imo the state is letting them put all of this out there, like iffy IP addresses, which really shows nothing more than they can be inconsistent. Etc.
Hawaii is filled with people who constantly love taking photos of what they are doing while there. Also plenty of CCTV all around Hawaii.
So I say, stay tuned. The best is yet to come.
Imo