This
30K gambling debt, as far as I can tell has not been mentioned in this trial at all. Not in the prosecution's OS's, or in witness testimony. It was mentioned in the Search warrants, and that is it. I also do not believe it was mentioned in the Preliminary hearing.
Funny how some want proof that Chase had a heart attack or health problems, yet this 30K gambling debt MUST be true. Neither has been brought up in the trial as of yet. I can at least find articles that references CM's heart condition being mentioned in pre-trial hearings, I can't find
anything other than the search warrant's saying:
According to Kavanaugh, Joseph lent Merritt $30,000 to pay a gambling debt Merritt incurred. Kavanaugh told San Diego County investigators Joseph planned to fire Merritt. I can find articles that mention it, but all of those articles, their source is the Search warrants.
Here is just one article from back in 2014 that mentions it was brought up in court:
McStay Suspect Has Health Problems: Atty
I'm not sure what you mean, Missy.
I would expect to see proof of both, since they both have been asserted as being true.
What is attested to in SWs are far more important, and official, than what an attorney may say or any defendant..
Usually at some point in a trial a detective will take the stand to give testimony concerning any SW that may have been gotten, including the probable cause affidavit attached to each one will be shown, and explained.
So respectfully, Missy, imhoo, comparing what an attorney may have said or CM, and what was in any official SW recorded document is like comparing apples to oranges.
This is what I would like to be confirmed through testimony.
1. Joey loaned CM money (30K) to pay off some of his gambling debts.
2. CM created a 100k in medical bill debt due to having heart problems, and it was due to having a heart attack.
If so, both sides should produce the evidence they both ascert to be true.
Proving CM had been given loans by Joey must be proven by the state.
However proving CM encountered such a serious debt of 100K due to having a heart attack would help the defense, and should be proven by them, not just because the attorney or CM said so.
If it was that serious there would be a long period of time he would have been unable to work, due the long time it takes to recover.
Has anyone else, like those who worked with him at MSM or elsewhere, testified about any of that, and how serious it was at the time? Surely the DT would take any opportunity to bring that to light through witness testimony.
In the PH, did CJ, mention it was tough for them financially when CM had his heart attack that landed him in the hospital where he racked up 100K in additional debt?
I think everyone wants both things proven one way or the other.
I don't know why anyone would want one proven only, and not the other. Why not both?
So has anyone else besides his attorney, and CM, himself verified it all happened?
How long was his hospital stay, and how long was he incapacitated at the time, before he recovered where he could get back to doing laborious work like usual?
As an aside: when I see the tv ads for viagra (spelling ?) they caution anyone from taking this particular drug if they have heart problems.
Didn't he just go to Mexico to buy viagra in January before this happened?
Imo