I think that they took for granted that L&C was there. All these reports/articles written, I bet they watched the youtube video's and wrote about it afterwards, which is one of the reasons why I have stopped reading them LOL
Part of "reporting" these trials is to convey not only the testimony but what is going on in the courtroom, who is there, who isn't there, how the defendant is reacting, how the jury is reacting, etc. This is the first trial that I have followed that this is completely absent!!!!! It is a crazy feeling, and almost wish I hadn't got sucked in 7 weeks ago LOL We didn't know until the first day if it was going to be streamed or not. I was even willing to follow it by twitter... but to give us 7 weeks and then pull out for a week or 2 and say "you aren't missing much', big PFFFFT to L&C. Not missing much if you haven't been watching it in the first 7 weeks I guess. I can't wait for CourtTV to come back
![Smile :) :)]()
LOL Although, I doubt they would have streamed it for the full 6 months on tv, maybe they would have streamed it online?
I am Canadian, all our bigger trials are tweeted, if you can get a few different reporters in there tweeting about it, you don't miss much and it feels like you are there! Take the Berreth case for example, last week the preliminary hearing was "tweeted", I don't feel like I missed a thing.