the whole defence is to blame the victim, according to defence the wearing of nail polish and heels by the victim was one of the reasons why he was murdered, appearently the defence think the victim is some kind of sexual predator because he may have made it known he was gay and may have expressed an interest in some of the boys at school
I think the victim is amazing, he refused to be bullied anymore, he painted his nails and dressed how he chose knowing the samll minded ignorant homophobes at his school woul only harrass him some more, but he drew a line in the sand and said this is who I am and I am not taking your crap anymore
the defendnat felt so affronted by the victim doing this he felt he had the right to assasinate the victim,
I only hope we have no juror who may fel in some way that being gay is wrong, and that they don't convict him for murder
this should be one of the easiest convictions the state gets, there were witnesses, he shot him twice in front of many witnesses,