- Joined
- Sep 13, 2003
- Messages
- 29,324
- Reaction score
- 45,677
First and foremost Websleuths is a true crime discussion forum. A very close second is we are a victim friendly forum. Rarely do these two descriptions collide. In the Papini case, discussion forum and victim friendly forum smash head-on into each other.
First and foremost we are a discussion forum.
Because there are many mainstream media articles about the discrepancies in Sherri’s story, we must allow a discussion to contain opinions that Sherri is not truthful, and the next logical leap is we must allow the theory that Sherri is not telling the truth about her kidnapping.
This is very difficult. We have the police saying they believe Sherri is telling the truth yet there are discrepancies.
Not that this played any part in my decision on what to allow in the Papini discussion I can tell you I can’t find anyone who believes her other than a handful of posters on Websleuths.
Let me just throw this out there…what if everyone is wrong? Can you imagine the pain?
Before I tell you the rules for discussion Sherri’s case, I want to envision you are sitting with Sherri, her husband, and her CHILDREN, while you are telling them your theory. Keep that vision in your mind while you type your post.
Whatever you choose to say (within TOS of course) you can do so in a kind and mature manner. With that in mind here is what is now open for discussion.
*You can discuss the discrepancies in Sherri's statements, her husband's, or anyone else who has given a statement to the police.
*You can discuss the discrepancies reported by the mainstream media. Example: Fox News Story http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/2...uestions-over-super-mom-kidnapping-claim.html
*You can discuss, like a mature person who is expressing their opinion in front of the whole Papini family, why you believe Sherri Papini is not telling the truth. A side note if you want I would love to read your theories on why the police are so adamant she is telling the truth
*You cannot use rumor and innuendo to explain your theory as to why Papini made up the kidnapping story. Must be fact-based. Meaning mainstream media and police sources.
If everyone uses common sense and does not reduce this discussion to name calling and all kinds of other immature acts, we shouldn’t have a problem.
Basing your opinion/posts on the facts in this case and doing so in a mature manner will mean the Papini thread will stay open. We shouldn't have any problems.
http://fox8.com/2017/10/27/a-year-a...s-mysterious-disappearance-new-info-surfaces/
http://people.com/crime/sherri-papini-dna-male-alleged-abduction/
BACKSTORY:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1525604334396831/
Missing Person Sherri Papini
UPDATE: Papini ransom money now going to anyone who turns in 'abductor'
skibaboo's Case Map
MEDIA/TIMELINES/MAPS
Thread #1
Thread #2
Thread #3
Thread #4
Thread #5
Thread #6
Thread #7
Thread #8
Thread #9
Thread #10
Thread #11
Thread #12
Thread #13
Thread #14
Thread #15
Thread #16
Thread #17
Thread #18
Thread #19
Thread #20
Thread #21
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1525604334396831/
Authorities search for missing woman in Shasta County
First and foremost we are a discussion forum.
Because there are many mainstream media articles about the discrepancies in Sherri’s story, we must allow a discussion to contain opinions that Sherri is not truthful, and the next logical leap is we must allow the theory that Sherri is not telling the truth about her kidnapping.
This is very difficult. We have the police saying they believe Sherri is telling the truth yet there are discrepancies.
Not that this played any part in my decision on what to allow in the Papini discussion I can tell you I can’t find anyone who believes her other than a handful of posters on Websleuths.
Let me just throw this out there…what if everyone is wrong? Can you imagine the pain?
Before I tell you the rules for discussion Sherri’s case, I want to envision you are sitting with Sherri, her husband, and her CHILDREN, while you are telling them your theory. Keep that vision in your mind while you type your post.
Whatever you choose to say (within TOS of course) you can do so in a kind and mature manner. With that in mind here is what is now open for discussion.
*You can discuss the discrepancies in Sherri's statements, her husband's, or anyone else who has given a statement to the police.
*You can discuss the discrepancies reported by the mainstream media. Example: Fox News Story http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/2...uestions-over-super-mom-kidnapping-claim.html
*You can discuss, like a mature person who is expressing their opinion in front of the whole Papini family, why you believe Sherri Papini is not telling the truth. A side note if you want I would love to read your theories on why the police are so adamant she is telling the truth
*You cannot use rumor and innuendo to explain your theory as to why Papini made up the kidnapping story. Must be fact-based. Meaning mainstream media and police sources.
If everyone uses common sense and does not reduce this discussion to name calling and all kinds of other immature acts, we shouldn’t have a problem.
Basing your opinion/posts on the facts in this case and doing so in a mature manner will mean the Papini thread will stay open. We shouldn't have any problems.
http://fox8.com/2017/10/27/a-year-a...s-mysterious-disappearance-new-info-surfaces/
http://people.com/crime/sherri-papini-dna-male-alleged-abduction/
BACKSTORY:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1525604334396831/
Missing Person Sherri Papini
Video here from KRCR News Channel → [video]https://www.facebook.com/oswaldsk/videos/10103576746628095/[/video]
UPDATE: Papini ransom money now going to anyone who turns in 'abductor'
skibaboo's Case Map
MEDIA/TIMELINES/MAPS
Thread #1
Thread #2
Thread #3
Thread #4
Thread #5
Thread #6
Thread #7
Thread #8
Thread #9
Thread #10
Thread #11
Thread #12
Thread #13
Thread #14
Thread #15
Thread #16
Thread #17
Thread #18
Thread #19
Thread #20
Thread #21
Video here from KRCR News Channel → [video]https://www.facebook.com/oswaldsk/videos/10103576746628095/[/video]
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1525604334396831/
Authorities search for missing woman in Shasta County