Milyandel
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2010
- Messages
- 30
- Reaction score
- 6
Hello all & thank you very much for keeping this thread alive! I've been feeling a bit bad because of my long absence, but there has been some major things going on in my life, so other activities had to give way to them.
carbuff: thanks so much for making that list about the "unexplained" entries, it's really helpful to us all!
CarlK: when checking my notes, Larry Williams is among the possibilities I have written down. Thanks for bringing him up, and Paul Fuchs too. Paul, it seems, is actually listed on the scorecard article as notation 34. EXPLETIVE DELETED (And btw, I remember wondering if the notation really was "expletive deleted" or was it for example that four-letter-word starting with f, which bears unfortunate resemblance to Paul's last name, and the article just censored it away...)
Ambercat: thanks for bringing those cases to our attention too. I haven't got as far as 1981 in my listing of UID's, but I'll keep HC 1283 in mind when getting there.
Now that I'm looking at these cases & reading the thread again, I'd like to refer back to Roger C. Levell. As tatertot suggested, it maybe should be checked, but I don't know how to go about submitting him. Any tips/ideas ?
carbuff: thanks so much for making that list about the "unexplained" entries, it's really helpful to us all!
CarlK: when checking my notes, Larry Williams is among the possibilities I have written down. Thanks for bringing him up, and Paul Fuchs too. Paul, it seems, is actually listed on the scorecard article as notation 34. EXPLETIVE DELETED (And btw, I remember wondering if the notation really was "expletive deleted" or was it for example that four-letter-word starting with f, which bears unfortunate resemblance to Paul's last name, and the article just censored it away...)
Ambercat: thanks for bringing those cases to our attention too. I haven't got as far as 1981 in my listing of UID's, but I'll keep HC 1283 in mind when getting there.
Now that I'm looking at these cases & reading the thread again, I'd like to refer back to Roger C. Levell. As tatertot suggested, it maybe should be checked, but I don't know how to go about submitting him. Any tips/ideas ?