Deceased/Not Found Canada - Alvin, 66, & Kathy Liknes, 53, Nathan O'Brien, 5, Calgary, 30 Jun 2014 - #12

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aha! Here it is http://justice.alberta.ca/programs_services/wills/Pages/default.aspx. To save from reading the whole document it is in the bullet points highlighting the changes in the Act. So it is a little different now under the changes.

"If two or more people die at or around the same time, the property is distributed as if each person died before the other. Previously, if two or more people died at about the same time, for property distribution purposes, the youngest was deemed to have survived."

Oh wait ... reading this a second time and now I'm confused.

PREVIOUSLY (i.e. prior to the new rules enacted as of Feb. 1, 2012) the youngest was deemed to have survived. But NOW it's "distributed as if each person died before the other".

Were they smoking some funny tabaccy when they came up with that? LOL How does that make anything clearer?

So the estate is distributed as if (a) AL died before KL; AND as if (b) KL died before AL??

So I guess my question still stands: what if AL and KL left their estate in their wills to different heirs and/or beneficiaries?
 
Did you follow one of the links and read comments where an 'AL' commented about Mexican land scams??? Mods, not sure if this is okay to post, hope it's okay...
'
Somewhere else in this thread or the previous one I recall another mention of an 'A L' commenting on something and we thought it was AL from the case but now I wonder about that..... and I can't find it at the moment.
 
'
Somewhere else in this thread or the previous one I recall another mention of an 'A L' commenting on something and we thought it was AL from the case but now I wonder about that..... and I can't find it at the moment.

Yes those were the posts about NC. I think LE may be aware of these.
 
I wonder if the person saying 'hello' was himself confused about how FB games work; not knowing that this game is automatically updated. It is odd though to think it was KL playing the game after DG had been charged with her murder.

Yes the more I think about it, KLs brother probably didn't know facebook generates those messages. I myself didn't know when I posted the original comment about the game updates. He probably thought she was posting it. I wonder if he contacted LE and other family members and someone told him it was automatically generated.
 
If AL and KL were caught up in some crazy Ponzi scheme... why the effort to sell the old and used items in the home? It couldn't have fetched more than a few thousand dollars. The cars did not appear to be for sale and from the interview with the neighbour not much had been sold. Seems like a considerable effort for a couple who could potentially be involved in some major fraudulent ventures. Were they involved as investors who lost out or were they involved at a criminal level? Is it possible they escaped the country with a bunch of others to avoid criminal charges? Why would they need Nathan for that?

Just a few pages back newstalk addressed a post in which a WS member wondered whether they might still be alive; newstalk made it very clear that LE must have substantial physical evidence of their deaths in order to bring charges of both first degree and second degree murder.

It's understandable for people to not want to accept a sad and upsetting outcome, but LE would not have brought those charges without very good reason.

It might seem preferable to some to come up with various crime novel-worthy scenarios that have the victims alive and in hiding, but the simplest explanations are often the best. Sometimes it's not a conspiracy - sometimes it's just a brute with a weapon.
 
With reference to discussion around psych evaluation, jury selection, etc. the suspect needs to plead first. Should he plead guilty it's a whole different ball game and will prevent a protracted, costly trial. He could also elect to be tried by judge alone.
 
Please read the following and NO MORE SLEUTHING OF FAMILY MEMBERS.

Victim Friendly

Websleuths is a victim friendly forum. Attacking or bashing a victim is not allowed. Discussing victim behavior, good or bad is fine, but do so in a civil and constructive way and ONLY IF IT IS RELEVANT TO THE CASE. Additionally, sleuthing family members or others that are not suspect is not allowed. Don't make random accusations or post personal information (even if it is public) like parking tickets, address, or first and last names of all their relatives and their neighbors. Also, never "bash" or attack them, or accuse them of involvement. However that does not mean that family members or others cannot come into discussion as the facts and issues of the case are discussed
.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?65798-Etiquette-amp-Information

Thank you
 
Did you follow one of the links and read comments where an 'AL' commented about Mexican land scams??? Mods, not sure if this is okay to post, hope it's okay...

Just wondering how he is related to AL? Sorry guys I am very confused by this large family tree
 
I have asked myself that why take NO question several times. The only thing I can come up with is that it has been mentioned that KL and NO were 'very close'...perhaps the only way she was willing to go is if NO was with her...there would be no other family around I'm presuming...and from what's been said, she was the hub of the family...so I'm thinking there's no way she could go without someone from the family...JMO


I really don't think she would do that to JO...
 
Just a few pages back newstalk addressed a post in which a WS member wondered whether they might still be alive; newstalk made it very clear that LE must have substantial physical evidence of their deaths in order to bring charges of both first degree and second degree murder.

It's understandable for people to not want to accept a sad and upsetting outcome, but LE would not have brought those charges without very good reason.

It might seem preferable to some to come up with various crime novel-worthy scenarios that have the victims alive and in hiding, but the simplest explanations are often the best. Sometimes it's not a conspiracy - sometimes it's just a brute with a weapon.


Here is a story that could help us understand the possibility that people can pull this off. It coincides with my post that you have commented on. With all due respect Newstalk is not an authorized source with LE. Coroners can rule someone dead and if you read this article, they clearly can be mistaken.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/the-1m-panama-rat-526370#.U-T259q9KSM

This is his story of faking his death...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...es-easy-fake-death-life-insurance-payout.html
 
Here is a story that could help us understand the possibility that people can pull this off. It coincides with my post that you have commented on. With all due respect Newstalk is not an authorized source with LE. Coroners can rule someone dead and if you read this article, they clearly can be mistaken.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/the-1m-panama-rat-526370#.U-T259q9KSM

That's perfect!! Thanks for sharing! It certainly does explain why some feel that there may be something more to this than meets the eye. :)
 
I really don't think she would do that to JO...

Why not? Because mothers don't do that to daughters? Was just watching a video of a funeral for a 7 month old baby girl in Chicago that was starved to death...her mother and father are charged with her murder. There are all sorts of things we need for our mental, emotional and physical survival. Who's to say how desperate someone could get, and to what lengths they may go to survive either emotionally, mentally or physically. There are also cases of children that have gone missing only to turn up with a relative 10, 20 years later. Anything is possible. It really depends on a person's frame of mind at the time. JMO
 
Tinkerbel1 there may be something more to this than meets the eye. :)[/QUOTE said:
On that score I agree 100%! I think we will be astounded at what we learn in the long run.
 
Here is a story that could help us understand the possibility that people can pull this off. It coincides with my post that you have commented on. With all due respect Newstalk is not an authorized source with LE. Coroners can rule someone dead and if you read this article, they clearly can be mistaken.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/the-1m-panama-rat-526370#.U-T259q9KSM

This is his story of faking his death...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...es-easy-fake-death-life-insurance-payout.html

And the best part of this story is they went to PANAMA. JMO
 
Here is a story that could help us understand the possibility that people can pull this off. It coincides with my post that you have commented on. With all due respect Newstalk is not an authorized source with LE. Coroners can rule someone dead and if you read this article, they clearly can be mistaken.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/the-1m-panama-rat-526370#.U-T259q9KSM

This is his story of faking his death...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...es-easy-fake-death-life-insurance-payout.html

Seriously? You're trying to compare a guy who pretended to get lost at sea with a house and farm full of physical forensic evidence, enough to allow LE to determine the victims are dead? Sorry, that doesn't cut it. IMO, at least.

For one thing, all they went by in the canoe man's case (I remember that from 2011) were the remains of the canoe, his continued absence, and his wife's claim that he was missing. There wasn't any forensic evidence to go by like there is here.

Secondly, canoe man noted that he was able to fool his sons into thinking him dead because "They had moved away, they were adults. We had lost contact, they were writing infrequently and making contact infrequently. ... They had their own lives to lead. You put in your own mind that they don't care." From what we know, that also doesn't apply in this case. AL and KL were at least close to RO, JO and the kids, and I believe most of the extended family kept in regular contact.

Besides which, by suggesting that this is in any way similar to canoe man's case, you're implying that AL and KL were willing to cause their family extreme grief by faking their deaths and faking them in such a spectacularly detailed and comprehensive way as to cause LE to believe supposedly faked forensic evidence. :banghead: Okay, maybe their financial dealings were a little eyebrow-raising but they don't appear to have been cruel people, and they'd have to be to put their loved ones through this.

Unless you think that the rest of the family might be aware of the deception ... in which case you'd also be accusing the family members of perpetrating fraud on the police, the courts and the public.

On another of your points: No, newstalk isn't LE but he's logical, practical, and has experience reporting on other crimes. There are a few others here who have valuable and helpful practical experience: ex-reporters, researchers, etc., but most of us are just interested observers who have no such experience from which to draw. But we can at least try to be logical about things.

While I completely dismiss the manner of canoe man's faked death as being in any way applicable to this case, there were a couple of things that did catch my attention.

From your first link: "Officers have begun probing a tangled web of finances involving mortgage and endowment policies, pension funds and property deals." Now that sounds familiar.

Also, mention of Panama.

And this: "He spent five years living in Panama under the identity stolen from dead baby John Jones." Like Garland's pretending to be Matthew Hartley.

Having said all that, I too believe there's more to this case than we know.
 
Why not? Because mothers don't do that to daughters? Was just watching a video of a funeral for a 7 month old baby girl in Chicago that was starved to death...her mother and father are charged with her murder. There are all sorts of things we need for our mental, emotional and physical survival. Who's to say how desperate someone could get, and to what lengths they may go to survive either emotionally, mentally or physically. There are also cases of children that have gone missing only to turn up with a relative 10, 20 years later. Anything is possible. It really depends on a person's frame of mind at the time. JMO

Not applicable in my opinion. There's a big difference between a new mother killing her baby (in a horrible way!) and a GRANDmother putting her grown daughter (the same one she raised and cared for all those years) through sheer hell by stealing her child and making her believe they were dead.
 
Hi Tinkerbel1 and welcome to WS! I'm kind of newish too! Anyway, I just wanted to ask....... do the courts/LE/whoever it is that would ask for a psychiatric assessment even have the right to ask for that from someone who isn't convicted? As far as I know, the accused and his lawyer do not even have full disclosure yet, and therefore do not even know why he was arrested or what LE has on him to implicate him in these murders... so does our society have the right to demand that someone be sent for psychiatric evaluation before any of this comes out??

The crown had 30 days from the time of arrest to prepare disclosure, and that will be delivered to defence counsel on August 14. The crown or the defence can request a psychiatric evaluation, or mental health assessment, to determine the "fitness" of the accused to stand trial. As more evidence is revealed, that will be delivered to the defence. That can continue up until the time of trial. I believe that the request for an evaluation can be made as early as Aug 14. Given that the accused has a history of mental health concerns, a mental health assessment seems very likely.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
196
Guests online
276
Total visitors
472

Forum statistics

Threads
608,779
Messages
18,245,746
Members
234,449
Latest member
Starvalentine45
Back
Top