I posted earlier in the thread but just continued to lurk, but Someone I trust is part of her extended family and she shared earlier that it wasn't ruled suspicious. And I was told a few things that I don't consider a rumour based on my source.
I know what I was told is the cause of death and it's pretty brutual and not normal of a suicide. I didn't pry and ask about the evidence the family was given, but itmwould be be interesting to know how the police came to their conclusion. None of this is posted in the media, so I'm not sure if what I have posted is allowed, but it seems like everyone on this site truly cares about this case and Jessica that I wanted to share what little I felt comfortable with.
In in any case, this is so extremely sad for everyone regardless of the details.
Oh wow
So so horrible and sad. My condolences to your friend.
So can I just ask for clarification-- the family doesn't agree with the police ruling then? They think it's suspicious and not suicide?
I don't know that for a fact, but if it was me and someone I cared about I don't think that I would be satisfied with the ruling or I would at least have a very hard time believing/understanding it. Again, I don't know all the evidence that they were presented with.
Why does anyone think LE made the wrong ruling?
I am not sure I understand.
At least one person that we are aware of, who happens to have a few more relevant details than we do, is having a difficult time believing/understanding/being satisfied with this determination.
For myself, although I do not know anyone involved personally, the outcome is too unbelievable to me to accept it. I will never believe that this seemingly happy young woman who seemed tickled with her soon-to-be-one-year-old child, would not have sought some major professional help and reached out to those closest to her, for a depression so deep that it was causing her to have thoughts of leaving her child motherless with what will surely be lifelong issues and perhaps stigma, and not even so much as a note.
The eventual determination by police was obviously not an obvious one, hence the over-two-months that it took to reach the determination, the tip-line, the special investigations unit, the searches, etc. We put all of our trust and faith into our police to do the best they can with what they have and what they are able to find out, but at the end of the day, they are human, they can make mistakes, they can be wrong, and they may not have discovered all of the information yet.
In a trial, the jurors are asked to weigh *all* of the evidence as a whole, and not zero in on one aspect, determine believability, make decisions as to whether the players are telling the truth, use common sense, etc. If the same things were applied in this case, based on what we have thus far been told, and otherwise sleuthed, it does not make sense on a number of fronts.
I don't know this, but my guess is that the family knows a certain number of things, and the rest, the police may have kept from them. If the family and loved ones seek more answers than what they're being told, I hope they find them and come to a point of acceptance, one way or another.
I believe it is not all that common that a suicide is not looked upon
in hindsight as having had signs, yet we have not heard one speck of that from anywhere, to my knowledge. Sure, a depressed person *may* be able to hide it to an extent, but there are signs which become more apparent and start to make more sense after the fact.
It has been known to happen that murders are ruled as suicides and perps end up walking free. If I was found dead and had no signs, before or after, of such a depression as to leave my child motherless, I would hope my family would pursue the matter on my behalf until they were satisfied they had received all of the answers. JR can't do that for herself. jmo