Are you posting on behalf of the group, LS?
There are alot of all-encompassing statements being made by yourself, and I am trying to determine if you are representing the group or not?
Anyone who has followed these types of cases would tell you that going online and doing Facebook Status updates, following along on the groups and posting etc. after your immediate family member has been found murdered, in the immediate days after the crime, has, generally speaking, only been seen in cases where said person ends up being a suspect or arrested. Check out Michael Rafferty, Terri Lynn McClintic, Terri Horman as examples of prolific Facebook posters after their crimes.
In Howard's case, he indicated he was a new member to Facebook in the last year or so, if I recall correctly. He did post quite a bit about his PTSD on the MM FB group.
Anyway, it wouldn't mean very much, and I confess, that I did raise an eyebrow at his comment, but, took it at facevalue (a facebook post, afterall) EXCEPT that NOW he has been charged with Melissa's heinous murder.
I can almost guarantee that Howard's Facebook comments will be brought into trial, just as we have seen with other cases.
JMO
I don't know what you mean by 'representing' the group? You mean the SCA? As I posted in my original post, I am a member of the SCA. I have been for over 25 years. I used to know HR much better than in the past 15 years, though I have met MR on occasion, I just would not call myself 'friends' of their's at this point, more like a casual acquaintance of MR who met her two or three times and an older friend of HR who hasn't really been more than acquaintance for the past 10 years or so. I am not a part of the SCA 'group' they lived in (which is called a Canton in the SCA) as I do not live near Ottawa.
Also as I posted in my original post, my SO has combat PTSD, and what I know about PTSD I've learned over far too many years from him, his counsellors, his friends who have it, his support group and mine, and his therapists, as well as personal experience and observation.
I have been lurking on these forms for many years, just never felt I had anything to offer in any of the prior threads I have read, since I have always had an interest in investigations and mysteries.
As to the mention of the FB posts by HR, I am not saying that it is wrong to look at posts, or anything like that when sleuthing, I'm just saying that despite the fact that I understand how a post like that must look like to everyone else, there will be ample proof available for the defense to present to show that that post was not out of character for HR, because it wasn't.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not posting any of this in 'defense' of anyone or anything, but in clarification. When sleuthing, it is easy to see red flags in a lot of things that may just lead you down the wrong road or on a wild goose chase. I know, I've been lead down those roads myself. Even in at least two different criminal cases I have been personally involved in.
I hope that answers your questions.