Mom of Five
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2008
- Messages
- 231
- Reaction score
- 0
Wow, soooooo disrespectful, you of course must be smarter than every other poster here so it's okay to be rude I guess.
BTW that's sarcasm.
Casey's Pants & the Knife and The Cleaning of the Pontiac
- Thread starter seekingjustice**
- Start date
Wow, soooooo disrespectful, you of course must be smarter than every other poster here so it's okay to be rude I guess.
BTW that's sarcasm.
fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
(bold above by me)
Please don't take offense, 'cause I'm not trying to be mean, but why do we have to wait for your evidence. Evidence isn't a matter of opinion. Interpretations ARE.
The story of "the Second Knife" has been discussed, contested, hashed out, explained ad nauseum. Hercule has explained in detail, as has JWG, and myself among others.
On several different threads.
Repeatedly.
The evidence being used to refute "the Second Knife" is supplied by the OCSO discovery documents.No statement regarding a knife found with the remains is in those documents.
Nobody else has provided ANY evidence contrary to those documents. during any of those discussions.
What evidence do you have to put forward?
If you are suggesting that LE is withholding disclosure of such evidence then please explain what leads you to think that.
fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
Darn it. Now I have to clean the coffee off my keyboard.
There's four in a set usually. The other one's bound to be out there somewhere.
Maybe we could start a thread to look for "the Fourth Knife."
Rumpole
Formerly known as "Hercule Poirot"
Don't be silly!
I imagine LE have all 3 in custody by now, but there is commonly six in a set.
G,C and LA ok so long as the mystery chiliman brings his own knife.
fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
Rumpole
Formerly known as "Hercule Poirot"
Is that right?
I am unfamiliar with the eating customs of the US.
But perhaps chiliman eats other things. A good hostess would be prepared.
LaLaw2000
Louisiana
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
- Messages
- 12,516
- Reaction score
- 1,821
UM, you do not have to wait for MY evidence. Please do not put words in my mouth! I have no evidence. Goodness, it is not something that one has to be so rude over. We are going to have to agree to disagree. I have heard of 2 knives and I do stick with that! And no, I do NOT suggest that LE is withholding evidence. I am 100% pro LE and pro Prosecution!
Rumpole
Formerly known as "Hercule Poirot"
Where have you "heard" of two knives?
If you show a document or a reliable source then it is valid.
If you show a document or a reliable source then it is valid.
fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
I keep thinking to myself...
"Self, you're just not explaining this right. If you'd only say the right words then they'd understand you."
I still haven't found those words, I guess.
Rumpole
Formerly known as "Hercule Poirot"
No, I blame myself too.
Mind you I'm not well, I have this pain in all the diodes down my left side!
fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
My sincere apologies if I appeared to be rude to you. I most certainly did not mean to.
Nor was I trying to put words in your mouth. You quoted and responded to the following post...
...by saying...
Since Hercule was conceding differences of "interpretations" and "press reports" I could only assume that you were referring to some "evidence" which you felt exists or is forthcoming.
fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
I understand that tea helps.
Rumpole
Formerly known as "Hercule Poirot"
Yes, I'm sure you're right. I'll just make a pot.
I think I do have the answer. Somebody left the Improbability Drive control askew, its not quite on 1:1.
BUMP!
There, that should have fixed it. I'll try it out during NG tomorrow.
fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
It won't work. I have it on good authority (reliable sources) that she is infinitely improbable.
Rumpole
Formerly known as "Hercule Poirot"
Right now you've done it.
Litotes it is!
I am not a little amused!
Perhaps it is us who are slightly out of phase with reality.
There are three knives as I said!
All three have been repeatedly claimed. It must be true?
fortytwo
What was the question?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
:clap::clap::clap:
Yep. Thought I'd let them continue to amuse themselves alone. . . .
mitzi
Watch us lie to cover for 'Princess'
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2008
- Messages
- 4,338
- Reaction score
- 9
I remember this too.
I also know they haven't said anything about her being "dismembered", but as I have said, I'd really like to know why Dr. G stopped herself when describing the remains. It is suspicious to me. There was something else that was clear to her but caught herself from saying. . . . with everything in this case being so bizarre, it really wouldn't surprise me if she didn't attempt this but didn't follow through completely.
Am I the only one that sees the combination of Dr. G's statement, the knife/knives, the condition of her remains and this attorney Mark making these comments suspicious?
No, you are not the only one. I have been wondering myself ever since Mark E. said that.