lostnfound85
Inactive
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2008
- Messages
- 466
- Reaction score
- 0
You haven't offended me because I agree with you entirely. I'd be willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that internally, LE is working this case primarily on the assumption that Caylee is dead, no matter how many times LE publicly states that this is a missing person case. It makes no sense to rule out a homicide on grounds that there is no body or forensic evidence. Often times, the criminal is able to dispose of all of the forensic evidence. The remains of homicide victims aren't always found. This does not mean that the homicide never occurred. All of the clues and evidence in this case, in their totality, points to Caylee's death.
I also don't understand all of the dissatisfaction being expressed over the lack of searches for Caylee. Where should LE look, and more importantly - why? Caylee's been missing for over two months, now. In that time, she could be anywhere on Earth. She could be in the South Pole, in Australia, or anywhere you could possibly imagine. LE doesn't just throw darts at a map to determine where to search. They need leads. It appears that there are no leads.
Actually, most killers of family members dispose of bodies fairly close to home, in places they know well. That's where you look.