Agreed. But when she moved out - she didn't take her belongings - didn't even take Caylee's favorite stuffed animal. She took nothing. Getting ticked and moving one thing - moving out while taking nothing that belongs to you or the child - that's something altogether different.
Let me tell you a little story... kind on this topic.
My niece had a baby and was living with my sister.
They got in a fight and my niece took her son who was only 2 months old..
raining outside with nothing but a diaper and a t shirt on.
My sister called the police and she was told there was not ONE thing she
could do because my niece was the babies mother.
She didn't even have a bottle! But they could do NOTHING!
I'm not sure why everyone on this board seem to think grandparents have
more rights then Casey had. They don't! If Casey wanted to keep Caylee from
her parents for 31 days there is nothing they could have done about it.
The only reason the got involved is because Casey admitted she didnt know where her daughter was and that she had been kidnapped. If Casey would have said that Caylee was in a safe place and she didnt want her parents to know where she was then this story would have ended right there.
My same niece was pregnant and doing drugs and there was NOTHING
my sister could do. We called the police and DCFS and neither of them
wanted anything to do with this!
The sad thing is that parents have more rights and many times LE does not want to get involved in family disputes!
We even had my niece walk into the police station and say she wanted to give her son
to my sister and guess what
they couldnt do anything about it.
My sister would have had to hire an attorney and go to court and it would have taken months for her to get custody!
Sad but true.