Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. But the photo you attached has lots of jpeg artifacts (like the big lumps and divots in the arms).
She could have been waving. Her arm could have been outstretched, just touching the glass.
1. The arm is curving unnaturally. Go open a sliding door, both with palm facing you and facing the door. When the palm faces you, your elbow goes out. When the palm faces the door, which is a very unnatural way to open the door, the upper arm stays straight (since your arm bones don't bend all that much.) Her arm is curving in a more circular fashion.
2. Her left arm looks longer than her right.
3. Her left arm looks much skinnier than her right.
4. The skin tones between the two parts of her arm look different.
5. The lighting looks odd on the part of the arm reaching up.
I totally agree that the arm opening the door looks hinky. It is rounding too much, when the natural tendency would be for there to be some kind of angle at the elbow due to the elbow going outward as the hand grips the door. Every time I have looked at the photo, it's not the height of the child (I think it is Caylee), but something odd about that left arm I'm drawn to. It looks too long and skinny also.
I think it's photoshopped.
I agree. Personally, I think it's Caylee.Right, whether the pic is elongated or not, the relationship of the child to the door handle is the main part of the evidence. I think the pic remains in evidence and that the court has no issue with it.
I think that if you look at Caylee in that dress her hair was very long, this little girl does not have long hair...
I've taken pictures of my son that don't show his face. They were meant to, but he turned too quick when his attention drifted to the next shiny thing. I never delete pictures of my 'lil man.One more thing why would you take this picture? Why would you take a picture of a little girl without her face showing?
One more thing why would you take this picture? Why would you take a picture of a little girl without her face showing?
To me it looks like Caylee's hair is up in that picture. I don't think it's hinky, but the lighting and angle make it seem odd.I think that if you look at Caylee in that dress her hair was very long, this little girl does not have long hair and also the arm looks weird. I think it's photoshopped is there a way to prove that?
It isn't any kind of evidence she drowned in the pool anyway. I think it's weak evidence.
everyone saying this is photoshopped, have any of you actually ever used photoshop?
everyone saying this is photoshopped, have any of you actually ever used photoshop?