Oh boy. First, no lawyer should ever, ever, ever demean another member of the Bar in pleadings unless it is a suit against that lawyer and even then calling him/her names is verbotten! Bad form for Baez. I wonder if he perhaps Baez doesn't need a little tutoring on the Canons of Ethics and the Rules of Professional Responsibility. But, bumbling along, his errors in judgment will not be taken out on his client so his bad form will not mean much when it comes time for the judge to make the decision as to whether to allow the deposition to take place or delay it pending trial.
Since the trial is presently scheduled for March and a 90 or 120 day delay in the deposition schedule is not going to cause ZG irreparable harm, there is simply no reason for Judge Rodriguez to push the issue. He will grant a reasonable extension of time to Baez and Morgan will have to deal with it.
Frankly, I do not think that ZG can prevail in her case in chief. Her ex-employer would have to take the stand and say that ZG's employment was terminated BECAUSE of the Caylee Anthony case and for no other reason, as would a spokesperson from ANY and ALL companies with whom she applied for employment and was denied. If ZG was fired from her cleaning job, the reason for termination will be in her employment record. I just do not see anyone entering "has the same name as Caylee Anthony's phantom Nanny" as the cause for termination. And if her termination were the result of such and her records reflected this information, she would be on unemployment. Since employment laws vary by State and I do not know how Florida's laws work, I can only assume it is an "employment at will" State, meaning that one can be terminated without reason - at the will of the employer. If it isn't, she would be suing her employer for firing her for such a ridiculous reason. Sorry, but I do not believe anyone will swear under oath that ZG was a perfect candidate for a position with their company, but was not hired because of her name being associated with the case.
On top of this, KC was shown a photo of ZG and said that this was not ZFG. ZG is not ZFG, there is no Fernandes(z) hyphen anything. KC said ZFG had no kids, ZG has 6. KC's description of ZFG could in no way be construed to be ZG. The link between KC's imaginary Nanny and ZG is tenuous if not remote. KC at no time implicated THIS particular woman. Morgan's actions are that of an "ambulance chaser" which is what every ignoramous calls a plaintiff personal injury attorney. This is a derogatory remark for a PPIA because it implies unethical conduct. But, Baez is a jailhouse jockey, so who is calling who names here?
A verbal and public chastisement from the Judge is sufficient as punishment for Baez' for allowing such pleadings to be filed. From what I understand Baez is only 3-4 years out of law school and Judges are lenient on newbies. I dont' know about Florida, but here Judges are elected, so they tend to not *advertiser censored** over the attorneys because it is the attorneys who finance the Judge's campaign and re-election. Furthermore, all Judges understand that they may one day lose an election to a new face and be looking for a job, so they do not burn any bridges. Finally, a Judge who really sticks it to another member of the Bar loses face with the attorneys who practice in front of him/her.
Remember that Judges, at some point before they rose to the bench, were practicing law somewhere and got to their new job by the good graces of their friends in the Bar. Any Judge who gets too high and mighty will find his "friends" $upporting another candidate in the next election.